Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prodromes of Failure After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • 1442 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 319.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Future demands for orthopaedic skill to soar. AAOS Bull. 1999;47:14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rodrigez JA, Bahende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement. a 20-year follow up study. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994;309:136–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prostheses. results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74A:980–986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingenix-Data Analyst Group. Columbus, OH: Ingenix; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mendenhall S. Get the low down on orthopaedic implants. Mater Manage Health Care. 1996;5:30–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coyte PC, Young W, Williams JI. Devolution on hip and knee replacement surgery? Can J Surg. 1996;39:373–378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saleh KJ, Rand JA, McQueen DA. Current status of revision total knee arthroplasty: how do we assess results? J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85A(Suppl):18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haas S, Insall J, Montgomery W, Windsor R. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A:1700–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elia EA, Lotke PA. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty associated with significant bone loss. Clin Orthop. 1991;271:114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE, et al. The results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988;226:86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic stabilizer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70A:491.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop. 2002;404:7–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rand JA, Peterson LF, Bryan RS, Ilstrup DM. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1986;35:305–318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sierra RJ, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT. Reoperations after 3200 revision total knee replacements: rate, etiology, and lessons learned. Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, February 2003;40.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lonner JH, Siliski JM, Scott RD. Prodromes of failure in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:488–492.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGinty JB. What is the meaning of “centers of excellence?” (editorial) Orthop Today. 1996;4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gottlieb S, Einhorn TA. Current concepts review: managed care: form, function, and evolution. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79A:125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kerr EA, Mittman BS, Hays RD, Leake B, Brook RH. Quality assurance in capitated physician groups. where’s the emphasis? JAMA. 1996;276:1236–1239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Michaels DM, Stiefel JD, Vogt WF. Subcapitation arrangements for specialists. Med Group Manage J. 1995;42(3):41–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenstein AH. Capitation and orthopedic services. J Healthcare Resource Manage. 1996;14(4):27–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sethurman V, McGuigan J, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Routine follow-up office visits after total joint replacement: do asymptomatic patients wish to comply? J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tsao A, Mintz L, McRae C, Stulberg SD, Wright T. Failure of porous coated anatomic prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty due to severe polyethylene wear. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75A:19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knight JL, Gorai PA, Atwater RD, Grothaus L. Tibial polyethylene failure after primary Porous Coated Anatomic total knee arthroplasty. aids to diagnosis and revision. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:748–757.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:476–482.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Battish R, Lonner JH, Lotke PA. Efficacy of mail surveys for follow-up of total knee patients. Proceedings of the 68th Annual Meeting of the AAOS. San Francisco, February 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McGrory BJ, Freiberg AA, Shinar AA, Harris WH. Correlation of measured range of motion following total hip arthroplasty and responses to a questionnaire. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:565–571.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim J, Lonner JH, Lotke PA. Non-response bias in mail surveys for follow up after total knee arthroplasty. (unpublished data).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jess H. Lonner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, USA

    James V. Bono MD (Associate Clinical Professor) (Associate Clinical Professor)

  2. New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, 02120, USA

    James V. Bono MD (Associate Clinical Professor) (Associate Clinical Professor)

  3. Harvard Medical School, USA

    Richard D. Scott MD (Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery) (Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery)

  4. Joint Arthroplasty Service, New England Baptist and Brigham and Women’s Hospitals, Boston, MA, 02120, USA

    Richard D. Scott MD (Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery) (Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lonner, J.H. (2005). Prodromes of Failure After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Bono, J.V., Scott, R.D. (eds) Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27085-X_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27085-X_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-22352-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27085-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation