Skip to main content

How to Explain Prosocial and Solidary Behavior: A Comparison of Framing Theory with Related Meta-Theoretical Paradigms

  • Chapter
Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

Summary and Outlook

As mentioned above, our discussion of the contributions to this book was organized not on a chapter-by-chapter basis but with an integrative perspective in mind. Our aim was to suggest commonalities and differences that emerge across the contributions, relate the results to the framing approach, and point to related meta-theoretical approaches in an attempt to put the theoretical approach of Lindenberg (this volume) to solidarity and prosocial behavior in perspective.

The conceptual issues on which the research on prosocial behavior presented in this book focused are the following. One basic issue is whether prosocial behavior is consistent across different measures, including measures of antisocial behavior. From the framing perspective, consistency among measures of prosocial behavior is expected, but this is not necessarily the case among measures of prosocial and antisocial behavior. Some of the main topics which run through the chapters of this volume include the principle of reciprocity, trust in social relationships, intergroup cooperation, structural factors that mold helpfulness in organizations, including interdependence and embeddedness, and hidden structural determinants of prosocial behavior, which relate to cultural and environmental influences. These topics constitute the main points of the agenda for future research on prosocial behavior and solidarity. This research will hopefully profit from the theory of framing outlined by Lindenberg (this volume) as well as from the other theoretical accounts that were taken into account, especially evolutionary theory. Although gaps between disciplines (e.g., psychology, sociology, biology) are obvious because they focus on different issues and use different methods, they have very much to offer to each other and hopefully will profit a lot in their future advances if interdisciplinary exchange is pursued more thoroughly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C.D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C.D., Van Lange, P.A.M., Ahmad, N., and Lishner, D.A. (2003). Altruism and helping behavior. In M.A. Hogg and J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 279–295). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H.W. (2002). Prosocial behavior. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H.W. (2005). The psychology of compassion and prosocial behavior. In P. Gilbert (Ed.), Compassion (pp. 148–167). Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H.W., and Rohmann, E. (2004). Altruistic personality in the context of the empathy-altruism hypothesis. European Journal of Personality, 18, 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H., Fiedler, K., and Strack, F. (2004). Social cognition. How individuals construct social reality. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B.P., and Schaufeli, W.B. (1999). Reciprocity in interpersonal relationships: An evolutionary perspective on its importance for health and wellbeing. European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 259–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L.A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 27, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R.B., Brown, S.L., Lewis, B.P., Luce, C., and Neuberg, S.L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J.M., and Latané, B. (1970). Norms and normative behavior: Field studies of social interdependence. In J. Macaulay and L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 83–101). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1997). On the division of labor in society (W.D. Halls, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1902)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., and Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, D., and Bierhoff, H.W. (2004). Altruismus aus evolutionstheoretischer Perspektive [Altruism fron the perspective of evolutionary theory]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 35, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.H. (1988). Passions within reasons: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S.J.C., and McBurney, D.H. (2001). Psychology: An evolutionary approach. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W.G., and Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, and S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795–824). San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., and Tietz, R. (1990). Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11, 417–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior: Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1987). Theories of group solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., and Thaler, R.H. (1987). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. In R.M. Hogarth and M.W. Reder (Eds.), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology (pp. 101–116). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., and Mechling, J. (1967). Betrayal and reconciliation in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komter, A.E. (1996). The gift: An interdisciplinary perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczynski, L. (1982). Intensity and orientation of reasoning: Motivational determinants of children’s compliance to verbal rationales. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczynski, L. (1983). Reasoning, prohibitions, and motivations for compliance. Developmental Psychology, 19, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R., and Costa, P.T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L.A. Pervin and O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, P., and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.D. (1989). The economics of crime and the sociology of deviant behavior. A theoretical confrontation of basic propositions. Kyklos, 43, 405–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1964). Social structure and personality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., and Wilson, D.S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J.H. Barkow et al. (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H.C. (1978). Some universals of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R.L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bierhoff, HW., Fetchenhauer, D. (2006). How to Explain Prosocial and Solidary Behavior: A Comparison of Framing Theory with Related Meta-Theoretical Paradigms. In: Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, B., Lindenberg, S. (eds) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics