Skip to main content

Diagnostic Laparoscopy

  • Chapter
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Conclusion

Full evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis are an integral component of any abdominal surgery, and this is easily performed laparoscopically. The limitations related to lack of direct tactile sensation are more than compensated by the advances in technology including magnified videoscopes which allow for enhanced visualization, ability to maneuver throughout the abdomen and pelvis, and laparoscopic ultrasound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conlon KC, Dougherty E, Klimstra DS, et al. The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy. Ann Surg 1996;223:134–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koea JB, Guillem JG, Conlon KC, et al. Role of laparoscopy in the initial multimodality management of patients with near-obstructing rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:105–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakajima K, Lee SW, Sonoda T, et al. Intraoperative carbon dioxide colonoscopy: a safe insufflation alternative for locating colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2005;19(3):321–325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Foroutani A, Garland AM, Berber E, et al. Laparoscopic ultrasound vs triphasic computed tomography for detecting liver tumors. Arch Surg 2000;135:933–938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsioulias GJ, Wood TF, Chung MH, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography optimize the staging and resectability of intraabdominal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2001;15:1016–1019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Milsom JW, Jerby BL, Kessler H, et al. Prospective, blinded comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography vs. contrast-enhanced computerized tomography for liver assessment in patients undergoing colorectal carcinoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:44–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goletti O, Celona G, Galatioto C, et al. Is laparoscopic sonography a reliable and sensitive procedure for staging colorectal cancer? A comparative study. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1236–1241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiser, M.R., Fichera, A. (2006). Diagnostic Laparoscopy. In: Milsom, J.W., Böhm, B., Nakajima, K. (eds) Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33863-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33863-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28254-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33863-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics