Skip to main content

Literacy in Developed and Developing Countries

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Educational Policy

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 13))

Abstract

Ideas about literacy have featured prominently on the policy agenda for decades, with few sharp differences between developed and underdeveloped societies. But research on literacy policies has reached a turning point today. The first testimony of this trend is the wish of many scholars to evaluate what the outcomes of the past 50 years of literacy research and innumerous literacy programs have been. Second, literacy has become an interdisciplinary field (Barton, 1994), and anthropology has made considerable contributions to it. Third, literacy has come to be seen as an element within a web of practical activities and community commitments (Etzioni, 1993; Selznick, 1992). Literacy work has been full of both enthusiasm and disappointment. The antagonisms of literacy and the discontinuities of history are the subject of the present chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Almond, G. A., & Coleman, J. S. (Eds.) (1960). The Politics of developing areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A. (1966). Literacy and schooling at the development threshold. In C. A. Anderson & Bowman, M. (Eds.), Education and economic development (pp. 159–183). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghel, F. (1994). Functional literacy in Romania — Between myth and reality. In J.-P. Hautecoeur (Ed.), Alpha 94: Literacy and cultural development strategies in rural areas. Toronto: Culture Concepts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. (Ed.) (1998–2001). Erinnerung, Geschichte, Identität [Memories and identity: Remembering history] (4 vols.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Schmitz, B., Clausen, M., Hosenfeld, I., & Köller, O. (1997). TIMSS: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich. Deskriptive Befunde [Third International Study of Mathematics and Sciences: An international comparison of teaching math and natural sciences]. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (Eds.) (2001). PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich [Basic competence in children: An international comparison]. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhola, H. S. (1984). Campaigning for literacy. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhola, H. S., & Bhola, J. K. (1984). Planning and organization of literacy campaigns, programs and projects. Bonn: Deutsche Stiftung für internationale Entwicklung (DOK 1240 C/a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfadelli, H., & Bucher, P. (Eds.) (2002). Lesen in der Mediengesellschaft. Stand und Perspektiven der Forschung [Reading in the literate society: The state of the art and the perspectives of the future]. Zürich: Pestalozzianum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1985). Sozialgeschichte des 15.–18. Jahrhunderts. Der Alltag [Social history from the 15th to 18th centuries: The history of everyday life]. München: Kindler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. (1969). Literacy and development in the west. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clanchy, M. T. (1979). From memory to written record: England. 1066–1307. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press & Edwin Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings, J., & Kahler, D. (1984). Peace Corps literacy handbook. Washington. Retrieved June 6, 2003 from http://www.peacecorps.gov.

  • Curtis, L. R. (1990). Literacy for social change. Syracuse, NY: New Readers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daswani, Ch. J. (Ed.) (2001). Language education in multilingual India. New Delhi: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1996). Education: the necessary utopia. In UNESCO (Ed.), Learning: The treasure within (pp. 11–33). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission (Ed.) (1991). Die Alphabetisierung geht weiter — Pressestimmen am Ende des Internationalen Alphabetisierungsjahres 1990 [Alphabetization continues: A press report at the end of the International Year of Literacy]. Bonn: UNESCO-Pressespiegel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donzelot, J. (Ed.) (1991). Face à l’exclusion: le modèle français. [Resist exclusion: The French model]. Paris: Esprit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, E. L. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change. Communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, G. (1987). Die gesellschaftliche Einbettung von Schriftgebrauch [The social embedding of writing]. In D. Baecker, & et al. (Eds.), Theorie als Passion (pp. 238–268). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, G. (1997). Pas de développement sans culture écrite. Réflexions sur la persistance de la pauvreté dans les pays moins avancés d’Afrique. [No development without literate culture: Reflections on the persistence of poverty in the lesser developed countries of Africa]. D+C — Développement et Coopération.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, G. (2001). Societal literacy: Writing culture and development. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Making of literate societies (pp. 54–67). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, G., & Giesecke, M. (1987). Technologische Entwicklung, Schriftkultur und Schriftsprache als technologisches System [Written language and literacy as technologies: The role of technological change]. In B. Lutz (Ed.), Technik und sozialer Wandel (pp. 418–438). Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1993). The Spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. (Ed.) (1970). The Social sciences and the comparative study of educational systems. Scranton, NJ: International Textbook Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flusser, V. (1992). Die Schrift. Hat Schreiben Zukunft? [Script: Does writing have a future?] Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, P. (Ed.) (1983). Co-operating for literacy: Report of an international seminar held in Berlin, October 1983. Toronto & Bonn: International Council for Adult Education & German Foundation for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • François, E. (1989). Alphabetisierung und Lesefähigkeit in Frankreich und Deutschland um 1800 [Literacy in France and Germany from 1800]. In H. Berding & E. François, & H.-P. Ullmann (Eds.), Deutschland und Frankreich im Zeitalter der Französischen Revolution (pp. 407–425). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1964). Economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, M. (1992). Sinnenwandel, Sprachwandel, Kulturwandel: Studien zur Vorgeschichte der Informationsgesellschaft [Desires change, languages change, and cultures change: Studies in the prehistory of the information society]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, M., & Elwert, G. (1983). Literacy and emancipation: Conditions of the literacy process and cultural revolutionary movements (16th century Germany and 20th century Bénin). Development and Change, 2, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gläss, B. (Ed.) (1990). Alphabetisierung in Industriestaaten? Europäische Probleme beim Umgang mit den Kulturtechniken Lesen und Schreiben [Problems of literacy in the industrial countries of Europe] (2nd ed.). Bonn: Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück, H. (1987). Schrift und Schriftlichkeit. Eine sprach-und kulturwissenschaftliche Studie [Script and literacy: A study in linguistics and the humanities]. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1968). Introduction. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1968). The Consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 27–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H. J. (1996). The persisting power and costs of the literacy myth. Literacy Across the Curriculum 12(2), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. S. (1956). The teaching of reading and writing. Chicago: UNESCO/Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillo, R. (1989). Anthropology, language, politics. In R. Grillo (Ed.), Social anthropology and the politics of language (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarmann, H. (1996). Early civilization and literacy in Europe: An inquiry into cultural continuity in the Mediterranean world. Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggis, S. (1992). Education for all: Purpose and context. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, D. (1976). Nonformal education and development. In D. Harman (Ed.), Expanding recurrent and nonformal education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautecoeur, J.-P. (1994). Opening reflections: Literacy in rural areas; orientations for action research. In J.-P. Hautecoeur (Ed.), Alpha 94: Literacy and cultural development strategies in rural areas (pp. 7–24). Toronto: Culture Concepts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, E. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (Ed.) (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D., Kett, J. F., & Trefil, J. S. (1988). The Dictionary of cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubik, S. (1994). Television and literacy: Development in the Czech Republic. In J.-P. Hautecoeur (Ed.), Alpha 94: Literacy and cultural development strategies in rural areas (pp. 197–209). Toronto: Culture Concepts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüfner, K., Naumann, J., & Meyer, J. (1984). Comparative education policy research: A world society perspective. Berlin: Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, C. (1987). Literacy: What do the definitions tell us? Convergence (Literacy in the industrialized countries: A Focus on practice), 20(3–4), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husfeldt, V. (2001). Literalität, Bildung und Beschäftigung [Literacy, cultivation of the mind, and employment]. Berlin: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I., & Sanders, B. (1988). ABC: The alphabetization of the popular mind. San Francisco: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Agency Commission (UNDP, UNESCO, UNICEF, WORLD BANK) (Eds.) (1990). World declaration on education for all and framework for action to meet basic learning needs, adopted by the World Conference on Education for All, Jomtien. New York: UNICEF House.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Ed.) (1995). Priorities and strategies in education: a World Bank review. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaestle, C. F., Campbell, A., Finn, J. D., Johnson, S. T., & Mikulecky, L. J. (2001). Adult literacy and education in America. Washington, DC: US Department, Office of Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I., & Jungeblut, A. (1986). Literacy: Profiles of America’s young adults. Final report of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department, Office of Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (1985). Illiterate America. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press, & Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefevre, L., & Martin, H.-J. (1976). The Coming of the book. London: NLB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D. (1958). The Passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1974). Tristes tropiques [Unhapppy in the tropics] (J., & D. Weightman, trans.). New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, S. (1966). Men, machines and history. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Literacy in the Information Age (2000). Final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Toronto: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E., & Verspoor, A. M. (1990, March). Improving primary education in developing countries: A review of policy options. Paper presented at the World Conference on Education for All, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1982). Language and cognition. Washington, DC: Winston Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüsebrink, H.-J. (1990). Schrift, Buch und Lektüre in der französischsprachigen Literatur Afrikas: Zur Wahrnehmung und Funktion von Schriftlichkeit und Buchlektüre in einem kulturellen Epochenum-bruch der Neuzeit [Reading and literacy in francophone Africa]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKitterick, R. (1990). Introduction. In R. McKitterick (Ed.), The uses of literacy in early mediaeval Europe (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerli, A., & Chartier, R. (Eds.) (2000). Lesen und Schreiben in Europa, 1500–1900. Vergleichende Perspektiven — Perspectives comparées [Reading and writing in Europe: Comparative history, 1500–1900]. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (1996). Literacy and non-formal (basic) education: Still a donor priority? Education For Development Occasional Papers, I, 3. London: Education For Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. (1991). Alphabetisierung im Rahmen des integrierten Grundbildungsansatzes der UNESCO. In I. Neu-Altenheimer & B. Sandhaas (Eds.), Grundbildung. UNESCO-Schwerpunkt der neunziger Jahre [Literacy on the basis of UNESCO’s approach to integrated basic education] (pp. 38–51). Bonn: Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento, G. (1990). Illiteracy in figures. Geneva: UNESCO, IBE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, H. J., & Damerow, P., & Englund, R. K. (1993). Archaic bookkeeping: Early writing and techniques of economic administration in the ancient Near East. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1973). The Rise of the western world: A new economic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1991). Literacy and objectivity: the rise of modern science. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 149–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R., & Torrance, N. (2001) (Eds.), The Making of literate societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD programme for international student assessment (PISA). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (Ed.) (1995). Literacy, economy and society: Results of the first International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouane, A. (1996). Literacy for the twenty-first century: The future of literacy and literacy of the future. Paper prepared for UNESCO seminar. Hamburg: UIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxenham, J. (1980). Literacy: Writing, reading and social organization. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxenham, J., Diallo, A. H., Katahore, A. R., Petkowa-Mwangi, A., & Sall, O. (2001). Strengthening livelihoods with literacy: Report of a study of programmes of adult education and training that have attempted to incorporate either training for livelihood skills into mainly literacy instruction, or literacy instruction into mainly strengthening livelihood skills (Draft). Bonn: Institute for International Cooperation of the Geman Adult Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (2nd ed.). Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompougnac, J.-C. (1996). Illetrisme: Tourner la page? [Illiteracy: Turn the page?] Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raible, W. (Ed.) (1998). Medienwechsel. Erträge aus 12 Jahren Forschung zum Thema “Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit” [Twelve years of research on orality and literacy]. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reh, M. (1981). Sprache und Gesellschaft [Language and society]. In B. Heine et al. (Eds.), Die Sprachen Afrikas (pp. 513–557). Hamburg: Buske.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix, H. (1992). Thesen zum Ursprung der Runen [Where the runes originated]. In L. Aigner-Foresti (Ed.), Etrusker nördlich von Etrurien, Akten des Symposions von Wien — Schloß Neuwaldegg, 2.–5. Oktober 1989 (pp. 411–441). Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1993). The world crisis in adult education. A case study from literacy. Compare, 23, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (1995). La nouvelle question sociale. [The new social question]. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenger, P. (1982). Silent reading: Its impact on late medieval script and society. Viator, 13, 367–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenda, R. (1970). Volk ohne Buch. Studien zur Sozialgeschichte der populären Lesestoffe 1170–1910 [People without books: Studies in the social history of popular reading: 1170–1910]. Frankfurt: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwöbel, H. (1982). Erziehung zur Überwindung von Unterentwicklung. Curriculumentwicklung emanzipatorischer Alphabetisierung und Grunderziehung zwischen Tradition und Moderne. Das Beispiel Somalia [Education to overcome underdevelopment: Creating a curriculum for literacy towards emancipation. Basic education between tradition and modernity, the case of Somalia]. Frankfurt: dipa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The Psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, R. (1981). Literacy: Current problems and current research. In Fifth Report of the National Council on Educational Research: Fiscal years 1978–1979 (pp. 30–40). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1992). The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. C. (Ed.) (1998). Literacy for the 21st century. Westpoint, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, B. (1983). The Implications of literacy: Written language and models of interpretation in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1993). Introduction: The new literacy studies. In B. Street (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1994). Cross-cultural perspectives on literacy. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and literacy in social practice (pp. 139–150). Avon, UK: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (1990). Cultural meanings of literacy. Geneva: UNESCO, IBE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1980). Language and literacy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triebel, A. (1997). Cognitive and societal development and literacy: A report on the state-of-the-art of research on literacy. Bonn: German Foundation for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triebel, A. (1998). Il est temps de réévaluer notre politique des langues. D+C — Développement et Coopération [Development and cooperation].

    Google Scholar 

  • Triebel, A. (2001). The Roles of literacy practices in the activities and institutions of developed and developing countries. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Making of literate societies (pp. 19–53). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (Ed.) (2002). United Nations literacy decade: Education for all. International plan of action, implementation of General Assembly resolution 56/116 (Report of the Secretary-General). Washington, DC: United Nations (A/57/218).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, & UNDP (Eds.) (1976). The Experimental world literacy programme. A critical assessment. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO International Co-ordination Secretariat for Literacy (Ed.) (1975). Declaration of Persepolis. International Symposium for Literacy, Persepolis, 3–8 September 1975. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (Ed.) (1990). Compendium of statistics on illiteracy. UNESCO Statistical Reports and Studies, 31. Paris: UNESCO Office of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1997). 50 Years of education. http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/50y/brochure/1.htm.

  • Wagner, D. (2000). Adult literacy: A Herculean task. UNESCO Sources, 122, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (1993). Literacy, culture, and development: Becoming literate in Morocco. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (1995). Literacy and development: Rationales, myths, innovations, and future directions. International Journal of Educational Development, 15(4), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterowd, W. R. (1989). The Culture and politics of literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Conference on Education For All. (1990). Final report. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Triebel, A. (2005). Literacy in Developed and Developing Countries. In: Bascia, N., Cumming, A., Datnow, A., Leithwood, K., Livingstone, D. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3201-3_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics