Skip to main content
  • 1284 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hennekinne S, Pessaux P, Regenet N, Fauvet R, Tuech JJ, Arnaud JP. [Double appendicitis: a rare clinical form in appendix duplication.] [French] Presse Med 2001;30:23–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hahn H, von Kalle T, Pfadler E, Franz R, Hilz B, Farber D. [Ultrasound appendix imaging in mucoviscidosis patients.] [German] Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1999;170:181–184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitz RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix, with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 1886;1:107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tiel-van Buul MM, Aronson DC, Groothoff JW, Van Baren R, Frenkel J, Van Royen EA. The role of renal scintigraphy in the diagnosis and follow-up of unilateral ATN after complete bilateral distal ureteral obstruction as a complication of acute appendicitis. Clin Nucl Med 1998;23:141–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grönroos JM, Grönroos P. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Radiology 2001;219:297–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001;136:556–562.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE et al. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 2001;220:103–107.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lowe LH, Penney MW, Scheker LE et al. Appendicolith revealed on CT in children with suspected appendicitis: how specific is it in the diagnosis of appendicitis? AJR 2000;175:981–984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, et al. Presence or absence of gas in the appendix: additional criteria to rule out or confirm acute appendicitis—evaluation with US. Radiology 2000;214(1):183–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe LH, Penney MW, Stein SM, et al. Unenhanced limited CT of the abdomen in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: comparison with sonography. AJR 2001;176:31–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Stallion A, et al. Imaging evaluation of suspected appendicitis in a pediatric population: effectiveness of sonography versus CT. AJR 2000;175:977–980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poortman P, Lohle PN, Schoemaker CM, et al. Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded prospective study. AJR 2003;181:1355–1359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR 2001;176:933–941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pena BM, Taylor GA. Radiologists’ confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR 2000;175:71–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Keyzer C, Tack D, de Maertelae, V, Bohy P, Gevenois P, Van Gansbeke D. Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT. Radiology 2004;232:164–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT—review of 100 cases. Radiology 2000;217:159–163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weltman DI, Yu J, Krumenacker J Jr, Huang S, Moh P. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5-and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient. Radiology 2000;216:172–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sivit CJ, Dudgeon DL, Applegate KE et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT. Radiology 2000;216:430–433.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mullins ME, Kircher MF, Ryan DP, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. AJR 2001;176:37–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 2001;220:683–690.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf HK, Soderman E, Frenckner B. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced Helical CT. Radiology 2004;231:427–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fefferman NR, Roche KJ, Pinkney LP, Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB. Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation. Radiology 2001;220:691–595.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao PM, Feltmate CM, Rhea JT, Schulick AH, Novelline RA. Helical computed tomography in differentiating appendicitis and acute gynecologic conditions. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:417–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pohl D, Golub R, Schwartz GE, Stein HD. Appendiceal ultrasonography performed by nonradiologists: does it help in the diagnostic process? J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:217–221.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van Breda Vriesman AC, Kole BJ, Puylaert JB. Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2278–2282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jahn H, Mathiesen FK, Neckelmann K, Hovendal CP, Bellstrom T, Gottrup F. Comparison of clinical judgment and diagnostic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: experience with a score-aided diagnosis. Eur J Surg 1997;163:433–443.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 2004;230:472–478.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, et al. Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 2001;218:757–762.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hormann M, Paya K, Eibenberger K, et al. MR imaging in children with nonperforated acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced MR imaging in sonographically selected cases. AJR 1998;171:467–470.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kao CH, Lin HT, Wang YL, Wang SJ, Liu TJ. Tc-99m HMPAO-labeled WBC scans to detect appendicitis in women. Clin Nucl Med 1996;21:768–771.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yasumoto R, Kawano M, Kawanishi H, et al. Left acute scrotum associated with appendicitis. Int J Urol 1998;5:108–110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sfairi A, Farah A, Patel JC. [Acute appendicitis in patients over 70 years of age.] [French] Presse Med 1996;25:707–710.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Slim K, Pezet D, Chipponi J. Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:398–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Khatti S, Faria SC, Medeiros LJ, Szklaruk J. Myeloid sarcoma of the appendix mimicking acute appendicitis. AJR 2004;182:1194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cobben LP, de Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB. Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology 2000;215:349–352.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:75–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Coulier B, Pestieau S, Hamels J, Lefebvre Y. US and CT diagnosis of complete cecocolic intussusception caused by an appendiceal mucocele. Eur Radiol 2002;12:324–328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoegerle S, Nitzsche EU, Stumpf A, et al. Incidental appendix carcinoid. Value of somatostatin receptor imaging. Clin Nucl Med 1997;22:467–469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Horiuchi S, Endo T, Shimoji H, et al. Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix endoscopically diagnosed and examined with p53 immunostaining. J Gastroenterol 1998;33:582–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fujishima N, Ooya M, Miura G, Yamaguchi M, Moriuti A. [A case of fibrous histiocytoma of the appendix with twisted stalk.] [Japanese] Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1998;99:865–867.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wan YL, Lee TY, Hung CF, Ng KK. Ultrasound and CT findings of a cecal lymphangioma presenting with intussusception. Eur J Radiol 1998;27:77–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim N, Reed WP Jr, Abbas MA, Katz DS. CT identification of abscesses after dropped appendicoliths during laparoscopic appendectomy. AJR 2004;182:1203–1205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Appendix. In: Advanced Imaging of the Abdomen. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-169-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-169-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-992-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-169-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics