Abstract
It is possible with RAISE to specify and do most refinement in an applicative framework, and then transform the concrete applicative specification into an imperative sequential or concurrent one. This is a change from a style more appropriate to proof of refinement to a style more appropriate to implementation.
The resulting imperative specification is typically hierarchical, with upper levels calling the functions of lower ones. This paper presents a further stage of development in which the hierarchical structure is transformed into a distributed one, and components communicate asynchronously. This also allows “horizontal” communication between components of previously separate hierarchies.
A major design aim is to reuse the hierarchical specification, as far as possible extending the existing modules by standard, generic components. The method should achieve correctness by construction, and be amenable to quality control; it is an example of an engineering approach using standard components and standard assembly techniques.
The method is illustrated by collaborative work done between UNU/IIST and the Vietnamese Ministry of Finance in developing a specification of a national financial information system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
The RAISE Method Group: The RAISE Development Method. BCS Practitioner Series. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)
Dung, D.T., Chi, L.L., Thu, N.L., Nam, P.P., Lien, T.M., George, C.: Developing a Financial Information System. Technical Report 81, UNU/IIST, P.O.Box 3058, Macau (September 1996)
Dung, D.T., George, C., Huan, H.X., Nam, P.P.: A Financial Information System. Technical Report 115, UNU/IIST, P.O.Box 3058, Macau (July 1997)
Jones, C.B.: Accommodating Interference in the Formal Design of Concurrent Object-Based Programs. Formal Methods in System Design 8, 105–122 (1996)
Gerth, R., Kuiper, R., Segers, J.: Interface Refinement in Reactive Systems. In: Cleaveland [9]
Meldal, S., Luckham, D.C.: Defining a Security Reference Architecture. Technical Report CSL-TR-97-728, Stanford University (June 1997)
Wegner, P.: Coordination as Constrained Interaction. In: Ciancarini and Hankin [8]
Ciancarini, P., Hankin, C. (eds.): COORDINATION 1996. LNCS, vol. 1061. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Cleaveland, W.R. (ed.): CONCUR 1992. LNCS, vol. 630. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
The RAISE Language Group: The RAISE Specification Language. BCS Practitioner Series. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)
Guttag, J.V.: Abstract data types and the development of data structures. CACM 20(6) (June 1977)
Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1985)
Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1989)
Milne, R.E.: Transforming Axioms for Data Types into Sequential Programs. In: Proceedings of 4th Refinement Workshop. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
George, C., Dũng, Đ.T. (1998). Combining and Distributing Hierarchical Systems. In: Broy, M., Rumpe, B. (eds) Requirements Targeting Software and Systems Engineering. RTSE 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1526. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10692867_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10692867_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65309-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49439-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive