Skip to main content

Defensive Universal Learning with Experts

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3734))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper shows how universal learning can be achieved with expert advice. To this aim, we specify an experts algorithm with the following characteristics: (a) it uses only feedback from the actions actually chosen (bandit setup), (b) it can be applied with countably infinite expert classes, and (c) it copes with losses that may grow in time appropriately slowly. We prove loss bounds against an adaptive adversary. From this, we obtain a master algorithm for “reactive” experts problems, which means that the master’s actions may influence the behavior of the adversary. Our algorithm can significantly outperform standard experts algorithms on such problems. Finally, we combine it with a universal expert class. The resulting universal learner performs – in a certain sense – almost as well as any computable strategy, for any online decision problem. We also specify the (worst-case) convergence speed, which is very slow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Farias, D.P., Megiddo, N.: How to combine expert (and novice) advice when actions impact the environment? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 16. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hannan, J.: Approximation to Bayes risk in repeated plays. In: Dresher, M., Tucker, A.W., Wolfe, P. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games 3, pp. 97–139. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalai, A., Vempala, S.: Efficient algorithms for online decision. In: Proc. 16th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT), pp. 506–521. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. McMahan, H.B., Blum, A.: Online geometric optimization in the bandit setting against an adaptive adversary. In: Shawe-Taylor, J., Singer, Y. (eds.) COLT 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3120, pp. 109–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutter, M., Poland, J.: Prediction with expert advice by following the perturbed leader for general weights. In: International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT), pp. 279–293 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hutter, M.: Universal Artificial Intelligence: Sequential Decisions based on Algorithmic Probability. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Gambling in a rigged casino: The adversarial multi-armed bandit problem. In: Proc. 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 322–331. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poland, J.: FPL analysis for adaptive bandits. In: 3rd Symposium on Stochastic Algorithms, Foundations and Applications, SAGA (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Motwani, R., Raghavan, P.: Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: The nonstochastic multiarmed bandit problem. SIAM Journal on Computing 32, 48–77 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hutter, M., Poland, J.: Adaptive online prediction by following the perturbed leader. Journal of Machine Learning Research 6, 639–660 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Solomonoff, R.J.: Complexity-based induction systems: comparisons and convergence theorems. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 24, 422–432 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutter, M.: Towards a universal theory of artificial intelligence based on algorithmic probability and sequential decisions. In: Proc. 12th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-2001), pp. 226–238 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Farias, D.P., Megiddo, N.: Exploration-exploitation tradeoffs for experts algorithms in reactive environments. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cesa-Bianchi, N., Lugosi, G., Stoltz, G.: Minimizing regret with label efficient prediction. In: Shawe-Taylor, J., Singer, Y. (eds.) COLT 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3120, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Cesa-Bianchi, N., Lugosi, G., Stoltz, G.: Regret minimization under partial monitoring. Technical report (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poland, J., Hutter, M. (2005). Defensive Universal Learning with Experts. In: Jain, S., Simon, H.U., Tomita, E. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3734. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11564089_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11564089_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29242-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31696-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics