Skip to main content

A Precise Approach for the Analysis of the UML Models Consistency

  • Conference paper
Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3770))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The UML notation is a well-know standard notation to describe OO systems. But the UML specification has certain imprecisions and ambiguities that, along with possible errors made by the modellers, may cause inconsistency problems in the models of the system. This paper presents a rigorous approach to improve the consistency analysis between UML diagrams.

This proposal is based on a previous formalization of the UML metamodel diagrams, [1,4] in Maude. The framework given by the specifications created helps to guarantee the consistency of models because all the specifications are integrated within the same formalism. This work focuses on the analysis of the inter-diagram consistency. Several examples of properties are shown that help to guarantee the consistency between UML Communication and Class Diagrams.

Financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, project DYNAMICA/PRESSURE TIC 2003-07804-C05-05.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fernández Alemán, J.L., Toval Álvarez, A.: Improving System Reliability via Rigorous Software Modeling: The UML Case. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference (track 10: Software and Computing), Montana, USA, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lucas Martínez, F.J., Toval Álvarez, A.: Formal Verification of Properties in the UML Collaboration Diagram. In: ICSSEA 2004: 3rd Workshop on System Testing and Validation, Paris (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández Alemán, J.L., Toval Álvarez, A.: Can Intuition Become Rigorous? Foundations for UML Model Verification Tools. In: International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whittle, J., Araújo, J., Toval Álvarez, A., Fernández Alemán, J.L.: Rigorously Automating Transformations of UML Behavior Models. In: Dynamic Behaviour in UML Models: Semantic Questions in conjunction with UML 2000, York, UK, ACM SIGSOFT, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. OMG: Object Management Group. UML Superstructure 2.0. Draft adopted Specification. Retrieved from, (2004) http://www.omg.org/uml

  6. Huzar, Z., Kuzniarz, L., Reggio, G., Sourrouille, J.L.: Consistency Problems in UML-based Software Development. In: Jardim Nunes, N., Selic, B., Rodrigues da Silva, A., Toval Alvarez, A. (eds.) UML Satellite Activities October 2004, Revised Selected Papers. LNCS, vol. 3297. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcote, C.: Maude 2.0 Manual. Versión 1.0 (2003) http://maude.csl.sri.com/

  8. Lucas Martínez, F.J., Toval Álvarez, A.: Algebraic Specification of the UML Collaboration Diagram and Applications. Tech. Rep. LSI 3, Department of Informatics and Systems. University of Murcia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Truong, N.T., Souquieres, J.: An approach for the verification of UML models using B. In: 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, ECBS 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, S.K., Carrington, D.: A Formal Object-Oriented Approach to defining Consistency Constraints for UML Models. In: 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Litius, J., Porres Paltor, I.: vUML: a Tool for Verifying UML Models. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vara, J., de Castro, V., Cáceres, P., Marcos, E.: Arquitectura de MIDAS-CASE: una herramienta para el desarrollo de SIW basada en MDA. 4a Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Ingeniería del Software e Ingeniería del Conocimiento. Madrid (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martínez, F.J.L., Álvarez, A.T. (2005). A Precise Approach for the Analysis of the UML Models Consistency. In: Akoka, J., et al. Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3770. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11568346_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11568346_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29395-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32239-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics