Skip to main content

Authoritative Re-ranking of Search Results

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3936))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We examine the use of authorship information in information retrieval for closed communities by extracting expert rankings for queries. We demonstrate that these rankings can be used to re-rank baseline search results and improve performance significantly. We also perform experiments in which we base expertise ratings only on first authors or on all except the final authors, and find that these limitations do not further improve our re-ranking method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brants, T.: Natural Language Processing in Information Retrieval. In: Proc. of CLIN 2004, Antwerp, Belgium, pp. 1–13 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, C.S., Maglio, P.P., Cozzi, A., Dom, B.: Expertise Identification using Email Communications. In: Proc. of CIKM 2003, New Orleans, LA, pp. 528–531 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chisholm, E., Kolga, T.G.: New Term Weighting Formulas for the Vector Space Method in Information Retrieval. Technical report ORNL/TM-13756, Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giles, C.L., Bollacker, K., Lawrence, S.: CiteSeer: An Automatic Citation Indexing System. In: Proc. of Digital Libraries 1998, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 89–98 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, K.-S., Park, Y.-C., Choi, K.-S.: Re-ranking model based on document clusters. Information Processing & Management 37(1), 1–14 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. TREC. TREC Enterprise Track (2005), http://www.ins.cwi.nl/projects/trec-ent/

  7. Xu, J., Croft, W.B.: Query Expansion Using Local and Global Document Analysis. In: Proc. of SIGIR 1996, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 4–11 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng, Z., Srihari, R.: Optimally Combining Positive and Negative Features for Text Categorization. In: Proc. of the ICML Workshop for Learning from Imbalanced Datasets II, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bogers, T., van den Bosch, A. (2006). Authoritative Re-ranking of Search Results. In: Lalmas, M., MacFarlane, A., Rüger, S., Tombros, A., Tsikrika, T., Yavlinsky, A. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3936. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11735106_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11735106_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33347-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33348-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics