Skip to main content

Computer-Mediated Collaborative Reasoning and Intelligence Analysis

  • Conference paper
Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3975))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Problems of bias in intelligence analysis may be reduced by the use of web-based cognitive aids. We introduce a framework spanning the entire collaborative thought process using the Angler and SEAS (Structured Evidential Argumentation System) applications. Angler encourages creative brainstorming while SEAS demands analytical reasoning. The dual nature of this approach suggests substantial benefits from using computer-mediated collaborative and structured reasoning tools for intelligence analysis and policymaking.

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) may be impacted by many factors, including group dynamics and cultural and individual differences between participants. Based on empirical research, potential enhancements to Angler and SEAS are outlined, along with experiments to evaluate their worth. The proposed methodology may also be applied to assess the value of the suggested features to other such CMC tools.

This work was partially supported by SRI International. The authors would like to thank Kent D. Harber and Eric Yeh for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Murray, K., Lowrance, J., Appelt, D., Rodriguez, A.: Fostering collaboration with a semantic index over textual contributions. In: AI Technologies for Homeland Security, Papers from the 2005 AAAI Spring Symposium, vol. 3, pp. 99–106 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lowrance, J.D., Harrison, I.W., Rodriguez, A.C.: Structured argumentation for analysis. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics, and Cybernetics: Focus Symposia on Advances in Computer-Based and Web-Based Collaborative Systems, Baden-Baden, Germany (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heuer Jr, R.J.: Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency. In: Psychology of Intelligence Analysis, Washington, D.C (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lord, C., Ross, L., Lepper, M.: Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 2098–2109 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Popp, R.L.: Exploiting AI, information and computational social science technology to understand the adversary. In: Slide presentation. 2005 AAAI Spring Symposium: AI Technologies for Homeland Security (March 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crook, R.H., Healy, C.C., O’Shea, D.W.: The linkage of work achievement to self-esteem, career maturity, and college achievement. Journal of Vocational Behavior 25(1), 70–79 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mutran, E.J., Reitzes, D.J., Bratton, K.A., Fernandez, M.E.: Self-esteem and subjective responses to work among mature workers: similarities and differences by gender. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 52(2), 89–96 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sussman, S.W., Sproull, L.: Straight talk: Delivering bad news through electronic communication. Information Systems Research 10, 150–166 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reed, M.B., Aspinwall, L.G.: Self-affirmation reduces biased processing of health-risk information. Motivation and Emotion 22, 99–132 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steele, R.D.: The new craft of intelligence. Advance review draft, OSS Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kean, T.H., Hamilton, L.H., Ben-Veniste, R., Kerrey, B., Fielding, F.F., Lehman, J.F., Gorelick, J.S., Roemer, T.J., Gorton, S., Thompson, J.R.: The 9-11 commission report: Final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States. Retrieved September 13, 2005 from National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Web site (2004), http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

  12. Wegner, D.M.: Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review 101, 34–52 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Asch, S.E.: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In: Guetzkow, H. (ed.) Groups, leadership, and men, pp. 177–190. Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sherif, M.: The psychology of social norms. Harper Brothers, New York (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R., Sherif, C.W.: Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robber’s Cave experiment. University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, Norman, OK (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.: The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel, S., Austin, W.G. (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 7–24. Nelson, Chicago (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Janis, I.: Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bond, R., Smith, P.B.: Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin 119(1), 111–137 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., Newcomb, T.: Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47, 382–389 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimbardo, P.G.: The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In: Arnold, W.J., Levine, D. (eds.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 17, pp. 237–307. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pennebaker, J.W.: Confession, inhibition, and disease. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 22, 211–244 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheese, B.E., Brown, E.L., Graziano, W.G.: Emotional expression in cyberspace: Searching for moderators of the Pennebaker Disclosure Effect via e-mail. Health Psychology 23, 457–464 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rourke, L., Anderson, T.: Exploring social communication in computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13(3), 259–275 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, K.D., Cheung, C.K.T., Choi, W.: Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(5), 748–762 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Campbell, J.A.: Communication apprehension and participation in videoconferenced meetings. In: Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Wellington, New Zealand (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lowry, P.B., Nunamaker Jr, J.F.: Synchronous, distributed collaborative writing for policy agenda setting using Collaboratus, an Internet-based collaboration tool. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ahuja, M.K., Galvin, J.E.: Socialization in Virtual Groups. Journal of Management 29(2), 161–185 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S.: Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 6(1), 116–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Corbitt, G., Gardiner, L.R., Wright, L.K.: A comparison of team developmental stages, trust and performance for virtual versus face-to-face teams. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kersten, G.E., Koszegi, S.T., Vetschera, R.: The effects of culture in computer-mediated negotiations. The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 5(2), 1–28 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nowson, S., Oberlander, J., Gill, A.J.: Weblogs, genres, and individual differences. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Coman, E., Rauh, C.: The impact of imagination on computer mediated telepresence. In: Presence panel: Information Systems Division, International Communication Association, San Diego, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nowak, K.L.: Sex categorization in computer mediated communication (CMC): Exploring the utopian promise. Media Psychology 5, 83–103 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Olaniran, B.: Individual differences and computer mediated communication: The role of perception. The Electronic Journal of Communication 3, 2 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Suh, K.-W., Couchman, P.K., Park, J.-W., Hasan, H.: The application of activity theory to WMC. In: Hasan, H., Gould, E., Verenikina, I. (eds.) Information Systems and Activity Theory, Expanding the Horizon, vol. 3, pp. 122–140. University of Wollongong Press, Wollongong (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mani, I., Klein, G.L.: Evaluating intelligence analysis arguments in open-ended situations. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, VA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Williams, K.D., Govan, C.L., Croker, V., Tynan, D., Cruickshank, M., Lam, A.: Investigations into differences between social- and cyberostracism. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 6(1), 65–77 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., Fujimoto, M.: Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in use. Center for Coordination Science Technical Report #155 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Harber, K.D., Pennebaker, J.W.: Overcoming traumatic memories. In: Christianson, S.A. (ed.) The Handbook of Emotion and Memory Research; Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  40. King, W.J.: Human-computer dyads? A survey of nonverbal behavior in human-computer systems. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces, Los Alamitos, CA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yeung, D.C., Yoshida, N.: Algorithms for identifying cognitive biases. Unpublished manuscript (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yeung, D.C., Lowrance, J.D.: Sociopsychological assessment of an information campaign EZ. In: SEAS Multi-dimensional Templates (2005), Available at, http://seas.ai.sri.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yeung, D., Lowrance, J. (2006). Computer-Mediated Collaborative Reasoning and Intelligence Analysis. In: Mehrotra, S., Zeng, D.D., Chen, H., Thuraisingham, B., Wang, FY. (eds) Intelligence and Security Informatics. ISI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3975. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11760146_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11760146_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34478-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34479-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics