Skip to main content

Observer Evaluations of Wavelet Methods for the Enhancement and Compression of Digitized Mammograms

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4046))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1414 Accesses

Abstract

Two observer experiments were performed to evaluate the performance of wavelet enhancement and compression methodologies for digitized mammography. One experiment was based on the localization response operating characteristic (LROC) model. The other estimated detection and localization accuracy rates. The results of both studies showed that the two algorithms consistently improved radiologists’ performance although not always in a statistically significant way. An important outcome of this work was that lossy wavelet compression was as successful in improving the quality of digitized mammograms as the wavelet enhancement technique. The compression algorithm not only did not degrade the readers’ performance but it improved it consistently while achieving compression rates in the range of 14 to 2051:1. The proposed wavelet algorithms yielded superior results for digitized mammography relative to conventional processing methodologies. Wavelets are valuable and diverse tools that could make digitized screen/film mammography equivalent to its direct digital counterpart leading to a filmless mammography clinic with full inter- and intra-system integration and real-time telemammography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Unser, M., Alroubi, A., Laine, A. (eds.): IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Special Issue on Wavelets in Medical Imaging (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kallergi, M., Clarke, L.P., Qian, W., et al.: Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and wavelet-enhanced, monitor displayed mammograms: an ROC study. Acad. Radiol. 3, 285–293 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qian, W., Clarke, L.P., Kallergi, M., Clark, R.A.: Tree structured nonlinear filters in digital mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13, 25–36 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heine, J.J., Kallergi, M., Chetelat, S.M., Clarke, L.P.: Multiresolution wavelet approach for sepa-rating the breast region from the background in high resolution digital mammography. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendricks, J., van Erning, L. (eds.) Digital Mammography: proceedings of the 4th international workshop on digital mammography, pp. 295–298. Kluwer, The Netherlands (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heine, J.J., Velthuizen, R.P.: A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection. Med. Phys. 27, 2644–2651 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucier, B.J., Kallergi, M., Qian, W., et al.: Wavelet compression and segmentation of mammographic images. J. Digit Imaging 7(1), 27–38 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Z., Kallergi, M., DeVore, R., et al.: The effect of wavelet bases on the compression of digital mammograms. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 14(5), 570–577 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kallergi, M., Heine, J.J., Berman, C.G., Hersh, M.R., Romilly, A.P., Clark, R.A.: Improved interpretation of digitized mammography with wavelet processing: A localization response operating characteristic study. AJR 182, 697–703 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kallergi, M., Lucier, B.J., Berman, C.G., Hersh, M.R., Kim, J.J., Szabunio, M.S., Clark, R.A.: High-Performance Wavelet Compression for Mammography: Localization Response Oper-ating Characteristic Evaluation. Radiology 238, 62–73 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heine, J.J., Deans, S.R., Cullers, D.K., Stauduhar, R., Clarke, L.P.: Multiresolution statistical analy-sis of high resolution digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 503–515 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daubechies, I.: Ten Lectures on Wavelets. SIAM, Philadelphia (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Burgess, A.E.: Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. Med. Phys. 22(5), 643–655 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swensson, R.G.: Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. Med. Phys. 23, 1709–1725 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kallergi, M., Heine, J.J., Lucier, B.J. (2006). Observer Evaluations of Wavelet Methods for the Enhancement and Compression of Digitized Mammograms. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35625-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35627-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics