Skip to main content

Clinical Application of a Semiautomatic 3D Fusion Tool Where Automatic Fusion Techniques Are Difficult to Use

  • Conference paper
Biomedical Image Registration (WBIR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4057))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1559 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the clinical advantages of using semiautomatic volume registration where automatic registration is problematic due to large deformations, small bone anatomy, or extraneous structures. Examples are drawn from clinical cases of MRI/PET breast studies, CT angiography/SPECT cardiac studies, and total wrist arthroplasty. These types of studies should be contrasted with those involving the head, thorax, and pelvis where there is much less deformation and the existence of (some) large bones facilitates automatic matching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: Automated 3D Registration of MR and CT Images of the Head. Medical Image Analysis 1, 163–167 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pluim, J.P., Maintz, J.B., Viergever, M.A.: Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging TMI 22, 986–1004 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer, C.R., Boes, J.L., Kim, B., Bland, P., Zasadny, K.R., Kison, P.V., Kora, K., Frey, K.A., Wahl, R.L.: Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin plate spline warped geometric deformations. Medical Image Analysis 3, 195–206 (1996/7)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knops, Z.F., Maintz, J.B., Viergever, M.A., Pluim, J.P. Normalized mutual information based registration using k-means clustering and shading correction. Medical Image Analysis (in press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shekhar, R., Walimbe, V., Raja, S., Zagrodsky, V., Kanvinde, M., Wu, G., Bybel, B.: Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners. J. Nucl. Med. 46, 1488–1496 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klabbers, B.A., de Munck, J.C., Slotman, B.J., Langendijk, H.A., de Bree, R., Hoekstra, O.S., Boellaard, R., Lammertsma, A.A.: Matching PET and CT scans of the head and neck area: Development and method of validation. Medical Physics 29, 2230–2238 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pfluger, T., Vollmar, C., WismŸller, A., Dresel, S., Berger, P., Suntheim, P., Leinsinger, G., Hahn, K.: Quantitative Comparison of Automatic and Interactive Methods for MRI-SPECT Image Registration of the Brain Based on 3-Dimensional Calculation of Error. J. of Nuclear Medicine 41, 1823–1829 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liberman, L., Morris, E.A., Lee, M.J., Kaplan, J.B., LaTrenta, L.R., Menell, J.H., Abramson, A.F., Dashnaw, S.M., Ballon, D.J., Dershaw, D.D.: Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR 179, 171–178 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann, U., Moselewski, F., Cury, R.C., Ferencik, M., Jang, I.K., Diaz, L.J., Abbara, S., Brady, T., Achenbach, S.: Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110, 2638–2643 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adams, B.D.: Total Wrist Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 27, 278–284 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olivecrona, H., Weidenhielm, L., Olivecrona, L., Noz, M.E., Maguire Jr., G.Q., Zeleznik, M.P., Svensson, L., Jonson, T.: Spatial component position in total hip replacement. Accuracy and repeatability with a new CT method. Acta Radiologica 44, 84–91 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy, D.P., Maguire Jr., G.Q., Noz, M.E., Kenny, R.: Automating image format conversion - twelve years and twenty-five formats later. In: Lemke, H.U., Inamura, K., Jaffee, C.C., Felix, F. (eds.) Computer Assisted Radiology - CAR 1993, pp. 253–258. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olivecrona, L., Crafoord, J., Olivecrona, H., Noz, M.E., Maguire Jr., G.Q., Zeleznik, M.P., Svensson, L., Weidenhielm, L.: Acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semi-automated program for volume merging. Acta Radiologica 43, 517–527 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Noz, M.E., Maguire Jr., G.Q., Zeleznik, M.P., Kramer, E.L., Mahmoud, F., Crafoord, J.: A versatile functional-anatomic image fusion method for volume data sets. Journal of Medical Systems 25, 297–307 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorniak, R.J.T., Kramer, E.L., Maguire Jr., G.Q., Noz, M.E., Schettino, C.J., Zeleznik, M.P.: Evaluation of a semiautomatic 3D fusion technique applied to molecular imaging and MRI brain/frame volume data sets. Journal of Medical Systems 27, 141–156 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maguire Jr., G.Q., Noz, M.E., Rusinek, H., Jaeger, J., Kramer, E.L., Sanger, J.J., Smith, G.: Graphics applied to image registration. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications CGA11, 20–29 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kimiaei, S., Noz, M.E., Jšnsson, E., Crafoord, J.J., Maguire Jr., G.Q.: Evaluation of polynomial image deformation using anatomical landmarks for matching of 3D-abdominal MR images and for atlas construction. IEEE Trans. Nuclear Science NS46, 1110–1113 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P.P.: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging TMI16, 187–198 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wells, W.M., Viola, P., Atsumi, H., Nakajima, S., Kikinis, R.: Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Medical Image Analysis 1, 35–53 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Malchau, H., KŠrrholm, J., Wang, Y.X., Herberts, P.: Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop. Scand. 66, 418–424 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Selvage, G.: Roentgen stereo photog ram me try. A method for the study of the kinematics of the selectee system, Thesis, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden (1974)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Noz, M.E. et al. (2006). Clinical Application of a Semiautomatic 3D Fusion Tool Where Automatic Fusion Techniques Are Difficult to Use. In: Pluim, J.P.W., Likar, B., Gerritsen, F.A. (eds) Biomedical Image Registration. WBIR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4057. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11784012_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11784012_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35648-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35649-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics