Skip to main content

Modular Ontologies – A Formal Investigation of Semantics and Expressivity

  • Conference paper
The Semantic Web – ASWC 2006 (ASWC 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4185))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the growing interest in modular ontology languages to address the need for collaborative development, integration, and use of ontologies on the Web, there is an urgent need for a common framework for comparing modular ontology language proposals on the basis of criteria such as their semantic soundness and expressive power. We introduce an Abstract Modular Ontology (AMO) language and offer precise definitions of semantic soundness such as localized semantics and exact reasoning, and expressivity requirements for modular ontology languages. We compare Distributed Description Logics (DDL), ε-connections, and Package-Based Description Logics (P-DL) with respect to these criteria. Our analysis suggests that by relaxing the strong domain disjointedness assumption adopted in DDL and ε-connection, as P-DL demonstrated, it is possible to overcome some known semantic difficulties and expressivity limitations of DDL and ε-Connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Lutz, C., Sturm, H., Wolter, F.: Fusions of description logics. In: Description Logics, pp. 21–30 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.: On the semantics of linking and importing in modular ontologies (extended version). Technical report, TR-408 Computer Sicence, Iowa State University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.: Towards collaborative environments for ontology construction and sharing. In: International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS 2006), pp. 99–108. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borgida, A., Serafini, L.: Distributed description logics: Directed domain correspondences in federated information sources. In: CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE, pp. 36–53 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F., van Harmelen, F.: C-OWL: Contextualizing ontologies. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 164–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghidini, C., Giunchiglia, F.: Local model semantics, or contextual reasoning = locality + compatibility. Artificial Intelligence 127(2), 221–259 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghidini, C., Serafini, L.: Frontiers Of Combining Systems 2, Studies in Logic and Computation. In: chapter Distributed First Order Logics, pp. 121–140. Research Studies Press, Hertfordshire (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grau, B.C.: Combination and Integration of Ontologies on the Semantic Web. PhD thesis, Dpto. de Informatica, Universitat de Valencia, Spain (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grau, B.C., Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Working with multiple ontologies on the semantic web. In: International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 620–634 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grau, B.C., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Kalyanpur, A.: Modularity and web ontologies. In: KR 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kutz, O., Lutz, C., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: E-connections of description logics. In: Description Logics Workshop, CEUR-WS, vol. 81 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kutz, O., Lutz, C., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: E-connections of abstract description systems. Artif. Intell. 156(1), 1–73 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Parsia, B., Grau, B.C.: Generalized link properties for expressive epsilonconnections of description logics. In: AAAI, pp. 657–662 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patel-Schneider, P., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: Web ontlogy language (owl) abstract syntax and semantics (February 2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/

  15. Schreiber, G., Dean, M.: Owl web ontology language reference (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

  16. Serafini, L., Stuckenschmidt, H., Wache, H.: A formal investigation of mapping language for terminological knowledge. In: IJCAI, pp. 576–581 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Serafini, L., Tamilin, A.: Drago: Distributed reasoning architecture for the semantic web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 361–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.G. (2006). Modular Ontologies – A Formal Investigation of Semantics and Expressivity. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds) The Semantic Web – ASWC 2006. ASWC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4185. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11836025_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11836025_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38329-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38331-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics