Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Perceptual Performance of Fuzzy Image Quality Measures

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2006)

Abstract

In this paper we present a comparison of fuzzy instrumental image quality measures versus experimental psycho-visual data. A psycho-visual experiment we recently performed at our departments was used to collect data on human visual perception. The Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) framework was applied in order to test which of our fuzzy image similarity measures correlates best to this human visual perception. Based on Spearman’s Rank Order Correlation coefficient we will show that the M \(^{p}_{\rm 6}\) and M \(^{h}_{i3}\) measures outperform their peers as well as the commonly used MSE and PSNR measures, in the case where image distortions are less trivial to distinguish with the bare eye.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, S.M., Yeh, M.S., Hsiao, P.Y.: A comparison of similarity measures of fuzzy values. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 72, 79–89 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.: Image denoising with block-matching and 3D filtering. In: Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems V, 6064A-30, IST/SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2006, San Jose, CA (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Escalante-Ramirez, B., Martens, J.B., de Ridder, H.: Multidimensional characterization of the perceptual quality of noise-reduced computed tomography images. J. Visual Comm. Image Representation 6, 317–334 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.: Pointwise Shape-Adaptive DCT as an overcomplete denoising tool. In: Proc. Int. TICSP Workshop Spectral Meth. Multirate Signal Process, SMMSP 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guerrero-Colon, J.A., Portilla, J.: Two-Level Adaptive Denoising Using Gaussian Scale Mixtures in Overcomplete Oriented Pyramids. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICIP conference, Genova, Italy, September 2005, pp. 105–108 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kayagaddem, V., Martens, J.B.: Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: experiments. Journal of Opt. Soc. Amer. A 13, 1178–1188 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pizurica, A., Philips, W., Lemahieu, I., Acheroy, M.: A Joint Inter- and Intrascale Statistical Model for Bayesian Wavelet Based Image Denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11(5), 545–557 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sendur, L., Selesnick, I.W.: Bivariate Shrinkage With Local Variance Estimation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9(12), 438–441 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sendur, L., Selesnick, I.W.: Bivariate Shrinkage Functions for Wavelet-Based Denoising Exploiting Interscal Dependency. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing 50(11), 2744–2756 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van der Weken, D., Nachtegael, M., Kerre, E.E.: The applicability of similarity measures in image processing. Intellectual Systems 6(1-4), 231–248 (2001) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van der Weken, D., Nachtegael, M., Kerre, E.E.: An overview of similarity measures for images. In: Proceedings of ICASSP 2002 (IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing), Orlando, United States, pp. 3317–3320 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Weken, D., Nachtegael, M., Kerre, E.E.: Using Similarity Measures for Histogram Comparison. In: De Baets, B., Kaynak, O., Bilgiç, T. (eds.) IFSA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2715, pp. 396–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Weken, D., Nachtegael, M., Kerre, E.E.: Using Similarity Measures and Homogeneity for the Comparison of Images. Image and Vision Computing 22(9), 695–702 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Weken, D.: The use and the construction of similarity measures in image processing., PhD thesis, Ghent University (in Dutch) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van De Ville, D., Nachtegael, M., Van der Weken, D., Kerre, E.E., Philips, W., Lemahieu, I.: Noise Reduction by Fuzzy Image Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 11(4), 429–436 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vansteenkiste, E., Van der Weken, D., Philips, W., Kerre, E. (2006). Evaluation of the Perceptual Performance of Fuzzy Image Quality Measures. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4251. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11892960_75

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11892960_75

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46535-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46536-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics