Skip to main content

A model for the management of imprecise queries in relational databases

  • Intelligent Data Base
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Uncertainty and Intelligent Systems (IPMU 1988)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 313))

Abstract

A new way of using database design theory to facilitate the formulation of precise or imprecise queries in crisp or fuzzy relational databases is proposed. It is shown that a specific representation of multivalued dependencies between attributes in a database can be equivalently translated into the formal framework of qualitative Markov trees. Any imprecise query can then be modelled by a set of belief functions on a set of nodes in the tree to be propagated to some other nodes. The dependency structure can be used to reveal restrictions in the choice of composite attribute values even during formulation of queries.

On leave from Dept. of Statistics; Institute for Psychology; Free University of Berlin; Habelschwerdter Allee 45; D - 1000 Berlin 33

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beeri, C., Fagin, R., Howard, J. (1977): A complete axiomatization for FDs and MVDs. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Management of Data, ACM, New York, pp. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buckles, P.B., Petry, F.E. (1982): A fuzzy Model for relational Databases. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 7, pp. 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dadam, P., Rohr, G.: Advanced Information Management. In: A. Blaser (ed.): IBM Heidelberg Scientific Center Bi-Annual Report, 1986/87. Doc. Nr. TR 88.02.001, pp. 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1986): A Set-theoretic View of Belief Functions—Logical Operations and Approximations by Fuzzy Sets. Int. Journ. General Systems, 12, pp. 193–226.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R. (1977): Multivalued Dependencies and a new Normal Form for relational Databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 2, pp. 262–278.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kacprzyk, J., Ziolkowski, A. (1987): Queries with fuzzy linguistic quantifiers using an alternative Calculus of linguistically quantified Statements. Second IFSA Congress Preprints, Tokyo, pp. 600–603.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kohout, L.J., Keravnou, E., Bandler, W. (1984): Automatic documentary Information Retrieval by means of fuzzy relational Products. In: H.-J. Zimmermann, L.A. Zadeh, B.R. Gaines (eds.): Fuzzy Sets and Decision Analysis. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol. 20, pp. 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mellouli, K., Shafer, G., Shenoy, P.P. (1986): Qualitative Markov Networks. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, Paris, pp. 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ozsoyoglu, Z.M., Yuan, L.-Y. (1987): A new normal Form for Nested Relations. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 12, pp. 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pearl, J. (1986): Fusion, Propagation, and Structuring in Belief Networks, Artificial Intelligence, 29, pp. 241–288.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prade, H., Testemale, C. (1984): Generalizing Database Relational Algebra for the Treatment of Incomplete or uncertain Information and vague Queries. Information Sciences, 34, pp. 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raju, K.V.S.V.N., Majumdar, A.K. (1987): The Study of Joins in fuzzy realtional Databases. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 21, pp. 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sanchez, E. (1987): Soft Queries in Knowledge Systems. Second IFSA Congress Preprints, Tokyo, pp. 597–599.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shafer, G. (1976): A mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shafer, G., Logan, R. (1985): Implementing Dempster's Rule for Hierarchical Evidence. School of Business, University of Kansas, Working Paper No. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shenoy, P., Shafer, G. (1986): Propagating Belief Functions with local Computations. IEEE Expert, Fall 1986, pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shenoy, P. P., Shafer, G., Mellouli, K. (1986): Propagation of Belief Functions: A distributed Approach. School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1986): Coherent Evidence Propagation in Expert Systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, Paris, pp.12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spies, M. (1988): Fuzzy relational Databases and qualitative Markov Trees—The Combination of two Uncertainty Models for efficient Access to large Databases including imprecise Queries (in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ullman, J.D. (1984): Principles of Database Systems. Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zadeh, L. A. (1978): Fuzzy Sets as a basis for a theory of possibility; Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmermann, H.-J. (1985): Fuzzy-Set Theory—and its Applications; Kluwer Nijhoff, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

B. Bouchon L. Saitta R. R. Yager

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spies, M. (1988). A model for the management of imprecise queries in relational databases. In: Bouchon, B., Saitta, L., Yager, R.R. (eds) Uncertainty and Intelligent Systems. IPMU 1988. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 313. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-19402-9_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-19402-9_67

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19402-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39255-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics