Skip to main content
  • 2539 Accesses

Abstract

A comprehensive simulation study recently has shown that, in order to identify best two-mode classifications, the user may apply different algorithms and select the result yielding the lowest squared centroid distance measurement (SCD). Knowing the outperformer among several goodness-of-fit measures creates the premises to develop an exchange algorithm for two-mode classifications. This paper presents the algorithm and discusses significance in gain of precision based on a large Monte Carlo Simulation study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BOTH, M. and GAUL, W. (1986): Em Vergleich zweimodaler Clusteranalyseverfahren. Methods of Operations Research, 57, 593–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE SOETE, G. (1984): Ultrametric Tree Representations of Incomplete Dissimilarity Data. Journal of Classification, 1, 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W.S. (1982): GENNCLUS: New Models for General Nonhierarchical Clustering Analysis. Psychometrika, 47 449~475.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • ECKES, T. (1993): Multimodale Clusteranalyse: Konzepte, Modelle, Anwendungen. In: L. Montada (Ed.): Bericht ueber den 38. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer Psychologic in Trier, 2, Goettingen, 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECKES, T. (1995): Recent Developments in Multimode Clustering. In: W. Gaul and D. Pfeiffer (Eds.): From Data to Knowledge: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Classification, Data Analysis and Knowledge Organisation. Berlin, Heidelberg, 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTUNG, J. and ELPELT, B. (1986): Multivariate Statistik — Lehr-und Handbuch der angewandten Statistik. München, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUBERT, L. and ARABIE, P. (1985): Comparing Partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OPITZ, O. (1980): Numerische Taxonomie. Stuttgart, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIX, R. (2003): Zweimodale hierarchische Clusteranalyse. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWAIGER, M. (1997): Multivariate Werbewirkungskontrolle, Konzepte zur Auswertung von Werbetests. Reihe neue betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 231, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNTERREITMEIER, A. and SCHWAIGER, M. (2002): Goodness of Fit Measures for Two-Mode Cluster Analyses. In: W. Gaul and G. Ritter (Eds.): Classification, Automation, and New Media. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Berlin, Heidelberg, 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schwaiger, M., Rix, R. (2005). An Exchange Algorithm for Two-Mode Cluster Analysis. In: Baier, D., Wernecke, KD. (eds) Innovations in Classification, Data Science, and Information Systems. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26981-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics