Skip to main content

Focalizing Measures of Salience for Wayfinding

  • Chapter
Map-based Mobile Services

Abstract

This chapter reviews a model of measuring the salience of a specific class of spatial features—fagades of buildings—for adaptation to abilities and preferences of user groups of wayfinding services. The model was intentionally designed to be open for such adaptations, and we will report on ways, experiences, and limitations of doing so. We will prove the hypothesis that focalization, i.e., adaptation to different decision situations, can be sufficiently modelled by weights of predetermined salience measures to increase wayfinding success. The long term goal is to identify sets of weights for typical foci of user groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, G. L. (1999): “Spatial Abilities, Cognitive Maps, and Wayfinding”. In Wayfinding Behavior, Golledge, R. G., Ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999, pp. 46–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, G. E., Smith, D., and May, A. J. (2001): “Supporting the navigation task: Characteristics of ‘good’ landmarks”. In Contemporary Ergonomics 2001, Hanson, M. A., Ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2001, pp. 441–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, E. H., Heth, C. D., and Broda, L. S. (1989): “Children’s Wayfinding: Response to instructions to use environmental landmarks”. Developmental Psychology, vol. 25(5), pp. 755–764, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, A. (1996): “Landmarks as Navigational Aids on Street Maps”. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, vol. 23(1), pp. 21–36, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., and Bertolo, L. (1999): “Spatial Discourse and Navigation: An Analysis of Route Directions in the City of Venice”. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 13), pp. 145–174, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, B. (2003): “Extracting Landmarks with Data Mining Methods”. In Spatial Information Theory, vol. 2825, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Kuhn, W., Worboys, M. F., and Timpf, S., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 2003, pp. 398–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh, S. M., Mark, D. M., Gopal, S., Gould, M. D., and Couclelis, H. (1990): “Verbal Directions for Wayfinding: Implications for Navigation and Geographic Information and Analysis Systems”. 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Brassel, K. and Kishimoto, H., Eds. Zurich: Department of Geography, University of Zurich, 1990, pp. 478–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., Lindberg, E., and Mäntylä, T. (1983): “Orientation in buildings: Effects of familiarity, visual access, and orientation aids”. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 68), pp. 177–186, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979): The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, K. L., Hegarty, M., and Montello, D. R. (1999): “Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments”. In Spatial Information Theory, vol. 1661, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Freksa, C. and Mark, D. M., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 1999, pp. 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960): The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, P.-E., and Denis, M. (2001): “When and Why are Visual Landmarks Used in Giving Directions?”. In Spatial Information Theory, vol. 2205, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Montello, D. R., Ed. Berlin: Springer, 2001, pp. 292–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothegger, C. (2003): “Automatic Selection of Landmarks for Pedestrian Guidance”. Institute for Geoinformation, Vienna University of Technology. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothegger, C., Winter, S., and Raubal, M. (2004): “Selection of Salient Features for Route Directions”. Spatial Cognition and Computation, vol. 4(2), pp. (in print), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubal, M., and Winter, S. (2002): “Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks”. In Geographic Information Science, vol. 2478, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Egenhofer, M. J. and Mark, D. M., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 2002, pp. 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubal, M. and Worboys, M. (1999): “A Formal Model of the Process of Wayfinding in Built Environments”. In Spatial Information Theory, vol. 1661, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Freksa, C. and Mark, D. M., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 1999, pp. 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrows, M. E. and Hirtle, S. C. (1999): “The Nature of Landmarks for Real and Electronic Spaces”. In Spatial Information Theory, vol. 1661, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Freksa, C. and Mark, D. M., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 1999, pp. 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timpf, S. (2002): “Ontologies of wayfinding: a traveler’s perspective”. Networks and Spatial Economics, vol. 2(1), pp. 9–33, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timpf, S., Volta, G. S., Pollock, D. W., Frank, A. U., and Egenhofer, M. J. (1992): “A Conceptual Model of Wayfinding Using Multiple Levels of Abstraction”. In Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, vol. 639, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Frank, A. U., Campari, I., and Formentini, U., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 1992, pp. 348–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom, A., and Denis, M. (2003): “Referring to Landmark or Street Information in Route Directions: What Difference Does it Make?”. In Spatial Information Theory, vol. 2825, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Kuhn, W., Worboys, M., and Timpf, S., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 2003, pp. 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1925): “Über Gestalttheorie”. Philosophische Zeitschrift für Forschung und Aussprache, vol. 1), pp. 39–60, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. (2003): “Route Adaptive Selection of Salient Features”. In Spatial Information Theory, vol. 2825, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Kuhn, W., Worboys, M. F., and Timpf, S., Eds. Berlin: Springer, 2003, pp. 320–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, A. (2003): “Die Relevanz von Geoobjekten in Fokuskarten”. In Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XIV, Strobl, J., Blaschke, T., and Griesebner, G., Eds. Heidelberg: Wichmann, 2003, pp. 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, A., and Richter, K.-F. (2002): “Using Focus Maps to Ease Map Reading”. Künstliche Intelligenz (4), pp. 35–37, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winter, S., Raubal, M., Nothegger, C. (2005). Focalizing Measures of Salience for Wayfinding. In: Meng, L., Reichenbacher, T., Zipf, A. (eds) Map-based Mobile Services. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26982-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics