Skip to main content

Reasoning about Layered Message Passing Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation (VMCAI 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2575))

Abstract

Lamport diagrams are partial orders which depict computations of message passing systems. It is natural to consider generalizations of linear time temporal logics over such diagrams. In [MR00], we presented a decidable temporal logic with local temporal modalities and a global ‘previous’ modality to talk of message receipts. It seems reasonable to extend the logic with a global ‘next’ modality as well, so that sending of messages may also be easily specified, but this (or other similar attempts) lead to undecidability. Hence we consider ways of restricting the models so as to obtain decidability, while retaining the expressiveness of global ‘next’ and global ‘previous’ modalities. For this, we consider Lamport diagrams presented as a sequence of layers. The layers themselves describe finite communication patterns and a diagram is obtained by sequential composition of such parallel processes. The logic is defined appropriately, with layer formulas describing processes within a layer, and temporal formulas describing the sequence of layers in the computation. When the number of events in layers is uniformly bounded and each layer is communication closed, we get decidability. Alternatively, a stronger uniform bound on what we term channel capacity also yields decidability. We present an example of system specification in the logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Holzmann, G. J. and Peled, D., “An analyzer for message sequence charts”, Software Concepts and Tools, 17(2), 1996, 70–77.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Peled, D. and Penczek, W., “Model checking of causality properties”, Proc. LICS, 1995, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alur, R. and Yannakakis, M., “Model checking of message sequence charts”, Proc. CONCUR 1999, Springer-Verlag LNCS 1664, 1999, 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bollig, B. and Leucker, M., “Modelling, specifying and verifying message passing systems”, Proc. TIME 2001, 2001, 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elrad, T. and Francez, N., “Decomposition of distributed programs into communication closed layers”, Science of Computer Programming, 2, 1982, 155–173.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunter, E., Muscholl, A. and Peled, D., “Compositional message sequence charts”, Proc. TACAS 2001, Springer-Verlag LNCS 2031, 2001, 496–511.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henriksen, J.G., Mukund, M., Narayan Kumar and Thiagarajan, P.S., “Regular collections of message sequence charts”, Proc. MFCS 2000, Springer-Verlag LNCS 1893, 2000, 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lamport, L., “Time, clocks and ordering of events in a distributed system”, Communications of ACM 21(7), 1978, 558–565.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Madhusudan, P., “Reasoning about sequential and branching behaviours of message sequence graphs”, Proc. ICALP 2001, Springer-Verlag LNCS 2076, 2001, 396–407.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Madhusudan, P. and Meenakshi, B., “Beyond message sequence graphs”, Proc. FST & TCS 2001, Springer-Verlag LNCS 2245, 2001, 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meenakshi, B. and Ramanujam, R., “Reasoning about message passing in finite state environments”, Proc. ICALP 2000, LNCS 1853, 2000, 487–498.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meenakshi, B. and Ramanujam, R., “Reasoning about layered message passing systems”, full version, http://www.imsc.res.in/~bmeena.

  13. Peled, D., “Specification and verification of message sequence charts”, In Proc. IFIP FORTE/PSTV, 2000, 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poel, M. and Zwiers, J., “Layering techniques for development of parallel systems”, Proc. CAV, 1992, 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramanujam, R., “Locally linear time temporal logic”, Proc. LICS, 1996, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rudolph, E., Graubmann, P. and Grabowski, J., “Tutorial on message sequence charts”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems-SDL and MSC, Vol. 28, 1996, 1629–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thiagarajan, P.S., “A trace based extension of propositional linear time temporal logic”, Proc. LICS, 1994, 438–447.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ITU-TS Recommendation Z.120-Message sequence chart, ITU-TS, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meenakshi, B., Ramanujam, R. (2003). Reasoning about Layered Message Passing Systems. In: Zuck, L.D., Attie, P.C., Cortesi, A., Mukhopadhyay, S. (eds) Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. VMCAI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2575. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36384-X_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36384-X_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00348-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36384-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics