Abstract
Humans apply a large variety of deception forms in their communicative acts; they are not necessarily ‘uncooperative’ in doing so, as they may even deceive for the benefit of their interlocutors [2,3]. Deception may be active or passive, according to whether the Speaker does something or not, to achieve his goal. It may be applied directly to the deception object p or may indirectly influence it through some ‘deception medium’ q that may be a cause, an effect or a diverting cause or effect of p. In this short paper, we examine how deception may be simulated if mental states are represented as belief networks and various weights are attached to beliefs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ballim, A., Wilks, Y.: Beliefs, stereotypes ad dynamic agent modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1, 1, 1991.
Castelfranchi, C., Poggi, I.: Lying as pretending to give information. Pretending to Communicate, H. Parret (Ed), Springer Verlag, 1993.
Castelfranchi, C., de Rosis, F., Grasso, F.: Deception and suspicion in medical interactions; towards the simulation of believable dialogues. Machine Conversations, Y Wilks (Ed), Kluwer Series in Engineering and Computer Science, 511, 1999.
de Rosis, F., Castelfranchi, C., Carofiglio, V.: Can computers deliberately deceive? A simulation attempt of Turing’s Imitation Game. Sumbitted for publication.
Ndiaye, A. and Jameson, A.: Predictive role taking in dialog: global anticipation feedback based on transmutability. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on User Modeling, KailuaKona, Hawaii, 137–144, 1996
Taylor, J.A., Carletta, J., Mellish, C.: Requirements for belief models in Cooperative dialogue. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6, 1, 1996.
Zukerman, I., Jinath, N., McConachy, R., George, S.: Recognising intentions from rejoinders in a bayesian interactive argumentation system. In PRICAI 2000 Proceedings, Melbourne. 8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carofiglio, V., de Rosis, F., Castelfranchi, C. (2001). Ascribing and Weighting Beliefs in Deceptive Information Exchanges. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds) User Modeling 2001. UM 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2109. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42325-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44566-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive