Skip to main content

Computing Phylogenetic Roots with Bounded Degrees and Errors

Extended Abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2125))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Given a set of species and their similarity data, an important problem in evolutionary biology is how to reconstruct a phylogeny (also called evolutionary tree) so that species are close in the phylogeny if and only if they have high similarity. Assume that the similarity data are represented as a graph G = (V, E) where each vertex represents a species and two vertices are adjacent if they represent species of high similarity. The phylogeny reconstruction problem can then be abstracted as the problem of finding a (phylogenetic) tree T from the given graph G such that (1) T has no degree-2 internal nodes, (2) the external nodes (i.e. leaves) of T are exactly the elements of V, and (3) (u, v)E if and only if d t (u,v) ≤ k for some fixed threshold k, where d t (u,v) denotes the distance between u and v in tree T. This is called the Phylogenetic KTH Root Problem (PRk), and such a tree T, if exists, is called a phylogenetic kth root of graph G. The computational complexity of PRk is open, except for k ≤ 4. In this paper, we investigate PRk under a natural restriction that the maximum degree of the phylogenetic root is bounded from above by a constant. Our main contribution is a linear-time algorithm that determines if G has such a phylogenetic kth root, and if so, demonstrates one. On the other hand, as in practice the collected similarity data are usually not perfect and may contain errors, we propose to study a generalized version of PRk where the output phylogeny is only required to be an approximate root of the input graph. We show that this and other related problems are computationally intractable.

Supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, under Grant No. 12780241. Work done while visiting at UC Riverside.

Supported in part by a UCR startup grant and NSF Grants CCR-9988353 and ITR-0085910.

Supported in part by NSERC Research Grant OGP0046613 and a CITO grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H.L. Bodlaender. Nc-algorithms for graphs with small treewidth. In The 14th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG 1988), LNCS 344, pages 1–10, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Brandstädt, V.B. Le, and J.P. Spinrad. Graph Classes: a Survey. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z.-Z. Chen, T. Jiang, and G.-H. Lin. Computing phylogenetic roots with bounded degrees and errors. Manuscript, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Jiang, G.-H. Lin, and J. Xu. On the closest tree kth root problem. Manuscript, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.E. Kearney and D.G. Corneil. Tree powers. Journal of Algorithms, 29:111–131, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Kloks. Treewidth. LNCS 842. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Křivánek and J. Moránek. NP-hard problems in hierarchical-tree clustering. Acta Informatica, 23:311–323, 1986.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. G.-H. Lin, P.E. Kearney, and T. Jiang. Phylogenetic k-root and Steiner k-root. In The 11th Annual International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2000), LNCS 1969, pages 539–551, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y.-L. Lin and S.S. Skiena. Algorithms for square roots of graphs. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 8:99–118, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Motwani and M. Sudan. Computing roots of graphs is hard. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 54:81–88, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Nishimura, P. Ragde, and D.M. Thilikos. On graph powers for leaf-labeled trees. In Proceedings of the 7th Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2000), LNCS 1851, pages 125–138, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.L. Swofford, G.J. Olsen, P.J. Waddell, and D.M. Hillis. Phylogenetic inference. In D.M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B.K. Mable, editors, Molecular Systematics (2nd Edition), pages 407–514. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, ZZ., Jiang, T., Lin, GH. (2001). Computing Phylogenetic Roots with Bounded Degrees and Errors. In: Dehne, F., Sack, JR., Tamassia, R. (eds) Algorithms and Data Structures. WADS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2125. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44634-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44634-6_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42423-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44634-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics