Skip to main content

Neutral Networks and Evolvability with Complex Genotype-Phenotype Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Life (ECAL 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2159))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate a neutral epoch during an optimisation run with complex genotype-to-fitness mapping. The behaviour of the search process during neutral epochs is of importance for evolutionary r obotics and other artificial-life approaches that evolve problem solutions; recent work has argued that evolvability may change during these epochs. We investigate the distribution of offspring fitnesses from the best individuals of each generation in a population-based genetic algorithm, and see no trends towards higher probabilities of producing higher fitness offspring, and no trends towards higher probabilities of not producing lower fitness offspring. A second experiment in which populations from across the neutral epoch are used as initial populations for the genetic algorithm, shows no difference between the populations in the number of generations required to produce high fitness. We conclude that there is no evidence for change in evolvability during the neutral epoch in this optimisation run; the population is not doing anything “useful” during this period.

The population may also drop in fitness; work on error thresholds looks at the conditions under which this transition to lower fitnesses may occur [16].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Altenberg. The evolution of evolvability in genetic programming. In K.E. Kinnear Jr, editor, Advances in Genetic Programming, chapter 3, pages 47–74. MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Barnett. Ruggedness and neutrality: The NKp family of fitness landscapes. In C. Adami, R.K. Belew, H. Kitano, and C.E. Taylor, editors, Artificial Life VI: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press / Bradford Books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.L. Burch and L. Chao. Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its muta-tional neighbourhood. Nature, 406:625–628, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.L. Cavalli-Sforza and M.W. Feldman. Evolution of continuous variation: Direct approach through joint distribution of genotypes and phenotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 73:1689–1692, 1976.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ebner, P. Langguth, J. Albert, M. Shackleton, and R. Shipman. On neutral networks and evolvability. In Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation: CEC2001. IEEE, Korea, 2001. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Hordijk. A measure of landscapes. Evolutionary Computation, 4(4):335–360, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Husbands. Evolving robot behaviours with diffusing gas networks. In P. Husbands and J.-A. Meyer, editors, Evolutionary Robotics: First European Workshop, EvoRobot98, pages 71–86. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Husbands, T.M. Smith, N. Jakobi, and M. O’Shea. Better living through chemistry: Evolving GasNets for robot control. Connection Science, 10(3-4):185–210, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.A. Huynen, P.F. Stadler, and W. Fontana. Smoothness within ruggedness: The role of neutrality in adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, itUSA, 93:394–401, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Jones and S. Forrest. Fitness distance correlation as a measure of problem difficulty for genetic algorithms. In L.J. Eshelmann, editor, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA95), pages 184–192. Morgan Kaufmann, CA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kimura. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kirschner and J. Gerhart. Evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95:8420–8427, July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Marrow. Evolvability: Evolution, computation, biology. In A.S. Wu, editor, Proceedings of the 1999 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Workshop Program (GECCO-99 Workshop on Evolvability), pages 30–33. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Naudts and L. Kallel. A comparison of predictive measures of problem difficulty in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 4(1):1–15, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.E. J. Newman and R. Engelhardt. Effects of neutral selection on the evolution of molecular species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 265:1333, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Nowak and P. Schuster. Error thresholds of replication in finite populations-mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller’s ratchet. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 137:375–395, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. T.M.C. Smith, P. Husbands, and M. O’Shea. Not measuring evolvability: Initial exploration of an evolutionary robotics search space. In Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation: CEC2001. IEEE, Korea, 2001. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.M.C. Smith, P. Husbands, and M. O’Shea. Neutral networks in an evolutionary robotics search space. In Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation: CEC2001. IEEE, Korea, 2001. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T.M.C. Smith and A. Philippides. Nitric oxide signalling in real and artificial neural networks. BT Technology Journal, 18(4):140–149, October 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Turney. Increasing evolvability considered as a large-scale trend in evolution. In A.S. Wu, editor, Proceedings of the 1999 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Workshop Program (GECCO-99 Workshop on Evolvability), pages 43–46. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. van Nimwegen, J.P. Crutchfield, and M. Huynen. Neutral evolution of muta-tional robustness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96:9716–9720, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G.P. Wagner and L. Altenberg. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50(3):967–976, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Weinberger. Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference. Biological Cybernetics, 63:325–336, 1990.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. C.O. Wilke. Adaptive evolution on neutral networks. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2001. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.O. Wilke, J.L. Wang, C. Ofria, R.E. Lenski, and C. Adami. Evolution of digital organisms lead to survival of the flattest. Nature, 2001. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smith, T., Husbands, P., O’Shea, M. (2001). Neutral Networks and Evolvability with Complex Genotype-Phenotype Mapping. In: Kelemen, J., Sosík, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2159. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44811-X_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44811-X_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42567-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44811-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics