Skip to main content

The Use of Associative Concepts in the Incremental Building of a Logical Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces (ICCS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2393))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A formal context associates to objects a description that combines automatically extracted properties (intrinsic) and manually assigned ones (extrinsic). The extrinsic properties are expressed by users according to intentions that are often subjective and changing, and determine the classification and retrieval of objects. So, we find it important to assist users in this task through the automatic suggestion of extrinsic properties to be assigned and even the discovery of rules to automate these assignements. The principle is to learn from the description of existing objects the extrinsic description of a new object. Because of the changing nature of users’ intentions, the assistance given in the incremental building of a logical context must be interactive. We present formal principles, and an application to the classification of email messages.

This author is supported by a scholarship from CNRS and Région Bretagne

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Cole and G. Stumme. CEM-a conceptual email manager. In G. Mineau and B. Ganter, editors, Int. Conf. Conceptual Structures, LNCS 1867, pages 438–452. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Ferr. Complete and incomplete knowledge in logical information systems. In S. Benferhat and P. Besnard, editors, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, LNCS 2143, pages 782–791. Springer, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. V. K. Finn. On machine-oriented formalization of plausible reasoning in the style of F. Backon-J.S. Mill. Semiotika Informatika, 20:35–101, 1983. In Russian.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ferr and O. Ridoux. A logical generalization of formal concept analysis. In G. Mineau and B. Ganter, editors, Int. Conf. Conceptual Structures, LNCS 1867, pages 371–384. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Ferr and O. Ridoux. Searching for objects and properties with logical concept analysis. In H. S. Delugach and G. Stumme, editors, Int. Conf. Conceptual Structures, LNCS 2120, pages 187–201. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Ganter and S. Kuznetsov. Formalizing hypotheses with concepts. In G. Mineau and B. Ganter, editors, Int. Conf. Conceptual Structures, LNCS 1867, pages 342–356. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Ganter and S. Kuznetsov. Pattern structures and their projections. In H. S. Delugach and G. Stumme, editors, Int. Conf. Conceptual Structures, LNCS 2120, pages 129–142. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Godin and R. Missaoui. An incremental concept formation approach for learning from databases. TCS, 133(2):387–419, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Godin, R. Missaoui, and H. Alaoui. Incremental concept formation algorithms based on Galois (concept) lattices. Computational Intelligence, 11(2):246–267, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kuznetsov. Learning of simple conceptual graphs from positive and negative examples. In J. M. Zytkow and J. Rauch, editors, Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, LNAI 1704, pages 384–391. Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Levesque. All I know: a study in autoepistemic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 42(2), March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Valtchev and R. Missaoui. Building concept (Galois) lattices from parts: Generalizing the incremental methods. In H. S. Delugach and G. Stumme, editors, Int. Conf. Conceptual Structures, LNCS 2120, pages 290–303. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Wille. Boolean concept logic. In G. Mineau and B. Ganter, editors, Int. Conf. Conceptual Structures, LNCS 1867, pages 317–331. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferré, S., Ridoux, O. (2002). The Use of Associative Concepts in the Incremental Building of a Logical Context. In: Priss, U., Corbett, D., Angelova, G. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces. ICCS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43901-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45483-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics