Skip to main content

Quantum versus Probabilistic One-Way Finite Automata with Counter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
SOFSEM 2001: Theory and Practice of Informatics (SOFSEM 2001)

Abstract

The paper adds the one-counter one-way finite automaton [6] to the list of classical computing devices having quantum counterparts more powerful in some cases. Specifially, two languages are considered, the first is not recognizable by deterministic one-counter one-way finite automata, the second is not recognizable with bounded error by probabilistic one-counter one-way finite automata, but each recognizable with bounded error by a quantum one-counter one-way finite automaton. This result contrasts the case of one-way finite automata without counter, where it is known [5] that the quantum device is actually less powerful than its classical counterpart.

Supported by the ML2000 project sponsored by the Swedish Institute.

Research supported by the Latvian Council of Science, grant 01.0354; European Commission, contract IST-1999-11234; Swedish Institute, project ML2000

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambainis, A., and R. Freivalds: 1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknessesand generalizations. Proc. 39 th FOCS (1998) 332–341

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ambainis, A., and J. Watrous: Two-way finite automata with quantum and classicalstates. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cs.CC/9911009

  3. Deutsch, D.: Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantumcomputer. Proc. Royal Society London, A400 ( 1989) 96–117

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gruska, J.: Quantum Computing, McGraw Hill (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kondacs, A., and J. Watrous: On the power of quantum finite state automata. Proc.38th FOCS (1997) 66–75

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kravtsev, M.: Quantum Finite One-Counter Automata. In: Proc. 26th SOFSEM(1999), LNCS 1725, Springer-Verlag, 431–440. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quantph/9905092

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bonner, R., Freivalds, R., Kravtsev, M. (2001). Quantum versus Probabilistic One-Way Finite Automata with Counter. In: Pacholski, L., Ružička, P. (eds) SOFSEM 2001: Theory and Practice of Informatics. SOFSEM 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45627-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45627-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42912-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45627-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics