Skip to main content

Assessment of the Benefit of Redundant Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability and Security (SAFECOMP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2434))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The evaluation of the gain in reliability of mult-iversion software is one of the key issues in the safety assessment of high integrity systems. Fault simulation has been proposed as a practical method to estimate diversity of multi-version software. This paper applies data-flow perturbation as an implementation of the fault injection technique to evaluate redundant systems under various conditions. A protection system is used as an example to illustrate the evaluation of software structural diversity, optimal selection of channel- pairs and the assessment of different designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avizienis, A. and J. P. J. Kelly, Fault tolerance by design diversity: concepts and experiments, IEEE Computer, Aug. 1984, pp:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eckhardt, D. & Lee, L., "A theoretical basis for the analysis of multiversion software subject to coincident errors", IEEE Trans. Software Eng., Vol. SE-11, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  3. Littlewood, B. & Miller, D., “A conceptual model of multi-version software”, Proc. of FTCS-17, IEEE 1987

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arlat, J. et al, Fault injection for dependability validation-A methodology and some application, IEEE Trans. Software En., Vol. 16,no. 2, Feb. 1990, pp:166–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, L., Napier, J., May, J., Hughes, G.: Testing the diversity of multi version software using fault injection. Procs of Advances in Safety and Reliability, SARSS(1999) 13.1–13.10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, L., May, J., Hughes, G., A Constant Perturbation Method for Evaluation of Structural Diversity in Multiversion Software, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1943:Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, Floor Koornneef & Meine van der Meulen (Eds.), Springer, Oct. 2000

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, V. & Kanal, L.N., "A general Branch and Bound Formulation for Understanding And/Or Tree Search Procedures", Artificial Intelligence, 21, pp.179–198, 1983

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Voas, J. M., McGraw, G.: Software Fault Injection: Inoculating programs against errors. Wiley Computer Publishing", 1998

    Google Scholar 

  9. Voas, J. M. Adynamic failure model for performing propagation and infection analysis on computer programs, PhD Thesis, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murill, B.W., Error flow in computer program, PhD thesis, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael, C.C., Jones, R.C., On the uniformity of error propagation in software, Technical Report RSTR-96-003-4, RST Corporation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quirk, W.J. and Wall, D.N., "Customer Functional Requirements for the Protection System to be used as the DARTS Example", DARTS consortium deliverable report DARTS-032-HAR-160190-G supplied under the HSE programme on Software Reliability, June 1991

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitra, S., N.R. Saxena, and E.J. McCluskey, “A Design Diversity Metric and Reliability Analysis for Redundant Systems,” Proc. 1999 Int. Test Conf., pp. 662–671, Atlantic City, NJ, Sep. 28-30, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geoghegan, S.J. & Avresky, D.R., “Method for designing and placing check sets based on control flow analysis of programs”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE, pp.256–265, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bishop, P.G., The variation of software survival time for different operational input profiles (or why you can wait a long time for a big bug to fail), Proc. 23th IEEE Int. Symp. On Fault-Tolerant Computing (FTCS-23), Toulouse, France, pp.98–107, 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, L., May, J., Hughes, G. (2002). Assessment of the Benefit of Redundant Systems. In: Anderson, S., Felici, M., Bologna, S. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability and Security. SAFECOMP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2434. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45732-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45732-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44157-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45732-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics