Skip to main content

The Client Utility as a Peer-to-Peer System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web Engineering and Peer-to-Peer Computing (NETWORKING 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2376))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Client Utility system developed at HP Labs in the mid 1990s was designed to address the problems inherent in distributed computing. This paper shows that the architecture we developed solves some of the problems faced by designers of Peer-to-Peer systems, particularly those of discovery, trust, and naming. We show how elements of the Client Utility architecture can be used to address the problems found in some existing Peer-to-Peer systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Karl Aberer, Magdalena Punceva, Manfred Hauswirth and Roman Schmidt, “Improving Data Access in P2P Systems”, IEEE Internet Computing 6(1):58–67, January-February.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biztalk, The Biztalk home page, http://www.biztalk.org

  3. John R. Douceur and Roger P. Wattenhofer, “Optimizing File Availability in a Secure Serverless Distributed File System”, Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, New Orleans, LA (October 2001), pp. 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Endeavors Technology 2001, The Endeavors home page, http://www.endeavors.com

  5. “E-speak Architectural Specification: Beta 2.2”, http://www.e-speak.net/library/pdfs/E-speakArch.pdf (1999)

  6. http://www.e-speak.net/library/pdfs/a.0/Architecture.pdf (2001)

  7. Freenet 2001, The Freenet home page, http://freenet.sourceforge.net

  8. Gnutella 2001, The Gnutella home page, http://Gnutella.wego.com

  9. Groove Networks, 2000, The Groove home page, http://www.groove.net

  10. J2EE, The Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition home page, http://java.sun.com/j2ee

  11. Jini Network Technology, http://www.sun.com/jini

  12. JXTA 2001, The JXTA home page, http://www.JXTA.org

  13. Alan H. Karp, “E-speak E-xplained”, HP Lab Technical Report, HPL-2000-101, http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2000/HPL-2000-101.html (2000)

  14. Alan H. Karp, Rajiv Gupta, Guillermo Rozas, Arindam Banerji, “The Client Utility Architecture: The Precursor to E-speak”, HP Labs Technical Report, HPL-2001-136, (2001) available at http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-136.html

  15. A. H. Karp, R. Gupta, G. Rozas, and A. Banerji, “Split Capabilities for Access Control”, HP Labs Tech Report, HPL-2001-164, June (2001), http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-164.html

  16. John Kubiatowicz, David Bindel, Yan Chen, Steven Czerwinski, Patrick Eaton, Dennis Geels, R. Gummadi, Sean Rhea, Hakim Weatherspoon, Westley Weimer, Chris Wells, and Ben Zhao “OceanStore: An Architecture for Global-Scale Persistent Storage”, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Cambridge, MA (November 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dejan Milojicic, Vana Kalogeraki, Rajan Lukose, Kiran Nagaraja, Jim Pruyne, Bruno Richard, Sami Rollins and Zhichen Xu “Peer-to-Peer Computing, HP Labs Technical Report, HPL-2002-57 available at http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002

  18. Morpheus 2001, The Morpheus home page, http://www.musiccity.com

  19. Napster 2000, The Napster home page, http://www.Napster.com

  20. Object Management Group, “The Common Object Request Broker Architecture”, formal/99-10-07, Version 2.3.1, October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murali K. Ramanathan, Vana Kalogeraki and Jim Pruyne, “Finding Good Peers in Peer-to-Peer Networks”, International Parallel and Distributed Computing Symposium, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (April 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Resource Description Framework (RDF), http://www.w3.org/RDF

  23. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP

  24. http://www.e-speak.net/community/esv-about.html

  25. UDDI, The UDDI home page, http://www.uddi.org

  26. VerticalNet, http://www.verticalnet.com/

  27. Steve Waterhouse, David M. Doolin, Gene Kan and Yaroslav Faybishenko, “Distributed Search in P2P Networks”, IEEE Internet Computing 6(1):68–72, January-February.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yahoo, The Yahoo home page, http://www.yahoo.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karp, A., Kalogeraki, V. (2002). The Client Utility as a Peer-to-Peer System. In: Gregori, E., Cherkasova, L., Cugola, G., Panzieri, F., Picco, G.P. (eds) Web Engineering and Peer-to-Peer Computing. NETWORKING 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2376. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45745-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45745-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44177-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45745-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics