Skip to main content

Measuring the Spatial Dispersion of Evolutionary Search Processes: Application to Walksat

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Evolution (EA 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2310))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a simple and efficient method for measuring the spatial dispersion of a set of points in a metric space. This method allows the quantifying of the population diversity in genetic algorithms. It can also be used to measure the spatial dispersion of any local search process during a specified time interval. We then use this method to study the way Walksat explores its search space, showing that the search for a solution often includes several stages of intensification and diversification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker A.L., Martin W.N.: Dynamics of a Distance Based Population Diversity Measure. Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chvátal V., Szemerédi E.: Many hard examples for Resolution. In Journal of the ACM, pages 759–768, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook S.A.: The complexity of theorem proving procedures. In Conference Records of Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 151–158, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois O., Andre P., Boufkhad Y., Carlier J.: SAT versus UNSAT. In Clique, Coloring and Satisfiability: Second DIMACS implementation challenge, Volume 26 of DIMACS series in Discrete Mathematics and Computer Science, pages 415–136, American Mathematical Society, 1996.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Frank J., Cheeseman P., Stutz, J. (to appear): When gravity fails: local search topology. Gupta and Nau (1992). On the complexity of blocks-world planning. Artificial Intelligence (1997) 56, 139–403

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg D.E., Richardson J.J.: Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. Gen. Algs. and their Apps.: Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. Gen. Algs., Cambridge, MA, July 1987, 28–31 (Lawrence Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones T., Forest S.: Fitness Distance Correlation as a Measure of Problem Difficulty for Genetic Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (1995) 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mauldin M.L.: Maintaining diversity in genetic search. In Proceedings of the National Conference on AI (1984) 247–250. AAAI.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McAllester D., Selman B., Kautz H.: Evidence for Invariants in Local Search. In Proceedings of AAAI-97 (1997) 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michalewicz Z.: Genetic algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Artificial Intelligence, Springer Verlag. New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller B.L., Shaw M.J.: Genetic Algorithms with Dynamic Niche Sharing for Multimodal Function Optimization. IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp786–791, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schuurmans D., Southey F.: Local search characteristics of incomplete SAT procedures. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Articial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), pages 297–302, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sefrioui M., Périaux J.: Fast convergence thanks to diversity. In Proc. of the Fifth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming (1996) 313–321

    Google Scholar 

  14. Selman B., Kautz H., Cohen, B.: Noise Strategies for Local Search. In Proceedings of AAAI-94 (1994) 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sidaner A., Chabrier J.-J., Bailleux O.: Towards a quantification of attraction in stochastic local search. Proc. of the Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence at ECAI’00, Berlin, Germany, pp 39–41, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sidaner, A., Bailleux, O., Chabrier, JJ. (2002). Measuring the Spatial Dispersion of Evolutionary Search Processes: Application to Walksat. In: Collet, P., Fonlupt, C., Hao, JK., Lutton, E., Schoenauer, M. (eds) Artificial Evolution. EA 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2310. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46033-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46033-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43544-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46033-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics