Skip to main content

What KL-ONE lookalikes need to cope with natural language

Scope and aspect of plural noun phrases

  • III. Sorts And Types In Natural Language (Understanding) Systems
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sorts and Types in Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 418))

Abstract

One of the major drawbacks of current NL processing systems is the lack of an adequate representation of plurals and of the means to reason about them. On one hand, this is due to the fact that current knowledge representation languages like KL-ONE lookalikes do not provide well-suited representational means either to describe sets, subsets, and elements or to deal with the respective relations or use them in specially tailored inference systems.

On the other hand, workers in linguistics provide some (although conflicting) theories about the referential, cardinal, and quantificational aspects of the meaning of plural noun phrases, namely Discourse Semantics Theory, Generalized Quantifier Theory, and Referential Net Theory.

Our goal in the present work is to extend KL-ONE lookalikes by set maintenance and to support the use of sets in an NL system with a well-suited linguistic theory.

The work presented here is being supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) in its Special Collaborative Program on AI and Knowledge-Based Systems (SFB 314), project N1 (XTRA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. J. Allen. Understanding Natural Language. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Allgayer and A. Fabri. Efficient maintenance of set relationships in SB-ONE +. Memo, Univ. des Saarlandes, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Allgayer. L SB-ONE+: Die Zugangssprache zu SB-ONE +. Memo, Univ. des Saarlandes, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Allgayer, R. M. Jansen-Winkeln, C. Reddig and N. Reithinger. Bidirectional Use of Knowledge in the Multi-Modal Natural-Language Access System XTRA. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Appelt. Reference and Pragmatic Identification. In: Proc. of the TINLAP-3, pp. 128–132, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Aue, S. Heib and A. Ndiaye. SB-ONE Matcher: Systembeschreibung und Benutzeranleitung. Memo Nr. 32, Univ. des Saarlandes, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Bartsch, A. D. Kader, I. Raasch and R. Schmitt. MOTHOLOG: ein Prolog Meta-Interpreter zum erklärbaren Beweisen disjunktiver und negativer Ziele. Memo, Univ. des Saarlandes, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Barwise and R. Cooper. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4:159–219, 1981.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Barwise and J. Perry. Situations and Attitudes. Bradford Books. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Bauer and G. Merziger. Conditioned Circumscription: Translating Defaults to Circumscription. Memo 34, Univ. des Saarlandes, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. D. Belnap. A Useful Four-Valued Logic. In: J. Dunn and G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 8–40, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Bergmann, M. Fliegner, M. Gerlach, H. Marburger and M. Poesio. IRS — The Internal Representation Language. WISBER Memo 14, Univ. of Hamburg, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Bosch and I. Wellner. ASCON: a reimplementation of the FUZZY associative network. Memo, Univ. des Saarlandes, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. J. Brachman, R. F. Fikes and H. J. Levesque. KRYPTON: Integration Terminology and Assertion. In: Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. Brachman, V. P. Gilbert and H. J. Levesque. An Essential Hybrid Reasoning System: Knowledge and Symbol Level Accounts of KRYPTON. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Croft. Determiners and Specification. In: J. Hobbs et al. (ed.), Commonsense Summer: Final Report, Chapter 7, Leland Stanford Junior University: Center for the Study of Language and Information, October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Donnellan. Reference and Definite Description. Philosophical Review, 75:281–304, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. L. Ginsberg. Multi-valued logic. In: Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 243–247, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ch. Habel. Prinzipien der Referentialität. Informatik-Fachberichte, 122. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong: Springer, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Heim. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD thesis, Univ. of Massachusetts, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Heinz and J. Matiasek. Die Anwendung Generalisierter Quantoren in einem natürlichprachigen Datenbank-Interface. In: Proc. of the Proceedings der 4. Österreichischen Artifical Intelligence Tagung, p. ??, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. R. Hobbs and S. M. Shieber. An Algorithm for Generating Quantifier Scopings. Computational Linguistics, 13(1–2):47–63, January–June 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. M. Jansen-Winkeln. HC2LC: a PROLOG to Lisp Compiler. Memo, Univ. des Saarlandes, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Kamp. A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. In: J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. B. J. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, pp. 277–322, Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Kronfeld. Donnallan's Distinction and a Computational Model of Reference. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Columbia University, New York, NY, pp. 186–191, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Levesque. A Logic of Implicit and Explicit Belief. In: Proceedings of the 4th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Austin, TX, pp. 198–202, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. Lifschitz. Pointwise Circumscription: Preliminary Report. In: Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 406–410, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. Link. Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals. In: P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers. Linguistical and Logical Approaches, pp. 151–180, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, Tokyo: D. Reidel, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Loebner. Natural Language and Generalized Quantifier Theory. In: P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers. Linguistical and Logical Approaches, pp. 181–201, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, Tokyo: D. Reidel, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. T. Loenning. Mass Terms and Quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10:??, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. MacGregor and D. Brill. LOOM User Manual. DRAFT, ISI, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. A. McAllester. Reasoning Utility Package User Manual. AI Memo 667, MIT, April 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. G. Moser. An overview of NIKL, the New Implementation of KL-ONE. Annual Report Nr. 5421, BBN, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Nebel. NIGEL Gets To Know Logic. In: Proceedings des GWAI-86 und der 2. Österreichischen Artificial-Intelligence-Tagung, Ottenstein/Niederösterreich, pp. 75–86, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. F. Patel-Schneider. A Four-Valued Semantics for Terminological Logics. Artificial Intelligence, 38(3):319–152, 1989.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Poesio. The QUARK Reference Manual. Memo Nr. 22, Univ. Hamburg, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. Putnam. The Meaning of ‘Meaning'. In: K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Reddig. 3D in NLP: Determiners, Descriptions, and the Dialog Memory in the XTRA System. In: Proceedings des GWAI-88, Geseke, West Germany, p. ??, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Reiter. A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13(2):81–132, 1980.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. B. Russell. On Denoting. Mind, 14:479–493, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. Scha and D. Stallard. Multi-level plurals and distributivity. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the ACL, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, pp. 17–24, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. G. Schmolze and R. J. Brachman. Proc. of the 1981 KL-ONE Workshop. FLAIR Technical Report No. 4, Fairchild Laboratory for AI Research, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schmolze. Syntax and Semantics of NIKL. Technical Report, ??, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. M. Shieber. Separating Linguistic Analysis from Linguistic Theories. In: P. Whitelock, M. M. Wood, H. L. Somers, R. Johnson, and P. Bennett (eds.), Linguistic Theory & Computer Applications, pp. 1–36, London, San Diego, New York, Berkeley, Boston, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. A. Stickel. Automated Deduction by Theory Resolution. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 1181–1186, 1985. (Also in: Journal of Automated Reasoning, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1985, pp.333–355.).

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. Thijsse. On some Proposed Universals of Natural Language. In: A. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, Dordrecht: Foris, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. van Benthem. Determiners and Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6:447–478, 1983.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. M. Vilain. The restricted language architecture of a hybrid representation system. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 547–551, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  49. K. von Luck. Räpresentation assertionalen Wissens im BACK-System — eine Fallstudie —. KIT Report 72, TU Berlin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  50. K. von Luck, B. Nebel, Ch. Peltason and A. Schmiedel. The Anatomy of the BACK-System. KIT-BACK Report, TU-Berlin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. P. Wellman and R. G. Simmons. Mechanisms for Reasoning about Sets. In: Proceedings of the 7th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Saint Paul, Minnesota, pp. 398–402, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  52. D. Westerstahl. Logical Constants in Quantifier Languages. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8:387–413, 1985.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Karl Hans Bläsius Ulrich Hedtstück Claus-Rainer Rollinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Allgayer, J., Reddig-Siekmann, C. (1990). What KL-ONE lookalikes need to cope with natural language. In: Bläsius, K.H., Hedtstück, U., Rollinger, CR. (eds) Sorts and Types in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 418. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52337-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52337-6_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52337-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46965-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics