Skip to main content

Circuit partitioning algorithms: Graph model versus geometry model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ISA'91 Algorithms (ISA 1991)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 557))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we have presented two different approaches toward circuit partitioning problem. One approach is based on a graph defined by connectivities among modules. The other one is based on geometric transformation. Since we have applications to VLSI layout design in mind, we need to check the effectiveness of these approaches by experiments, which was left as future subjects.

This work was partially supported by Grant in Aid for Scientific Research of the Ministry of Education, Science and Cultures of Japan

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. David Avis: ”Diameter Partitioning, Discrete and Computational Geometry,” 1, pp. 265–276 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Asano, B. Bhattacharya, J. M. Keil, and F. F. Yao: ”Clustering Algorithms Based on Minimum and Maximum Spanning Trees”, Proc. 4th Ann. ACM Symp. Computational Geometry, Urbana-Champaign, pp.252–257, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Asano, L.J. Guibas and T. Tokuyama: ”Walking on an Arrangement Topologicaly,” to appear in Proc. 7th Ann. ACM Symp. Computational Geometry, North Conway, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson: ”Computers and Intractability,” Freeman, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Garey, D.S. Johnson and L. Stockmeyer: ”Some Simplified NP-complete Graph Problems,” Theor. Comput. Sci. 1, pp. 237–267, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Edelsbrunner and L. J. Guibas: ”Topologically Sweeping an Arrangement”, Proc. 18th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp.389–403, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hansen and B. Jaumard: ”Minimum sum of diameters clustering”, Journal of Classification, pp.215–226, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Horowitz and S. Sahni: ”Exact and Approximate Algorithms for Scheduling Nonidentical Processors”, J. of ACM, vol. 23, pp. 317–327, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. Lauther: ”A Min-cut Placement Algorithm for General Cells Assemblies Based on a Graph Representation”, J. Digital Systems, vol. 4, pp. 21–34, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Monma and S. Suri: ”Partitioning Points and Graphs to Minimize the Maximum or Sum of Diameters”, Proc. of the 6th International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Graphs, Kalamazoo, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.H.J.M. Otten: ”Automatic Floorplan Design”, Proc. 19th Design Automation Conf., pp.261–267, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Wen-Lian Hsu R. C. T. Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asano, T., Tokuyama, T. (1991). Circuit partitioning algorithms: Graph model versus geometry model. In: Hsu, WL., Lee, R.C.T. (eds) ISA'91 Algorithms. ISA 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 557. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54945-5_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54945-5_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54945-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46600-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics