Skip to main content

Syntactic selection in linguistic realization: A comparative study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 587))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

This paper clarifies the differences between structural and functional grammar theories from the viewpoint of syntactic selection in linguistic realization. Structural theories such as Context Free Grammar and Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar are based on immediate dominance and linear precedence while functional theories such as Systemic Functional Grammar are based on functions and linear precedence. To bridge the gap between two theories, we need to develop a structural theory which permits any kinds of immediate dominance, or which can specify a particular node to construct a grammatical structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrian Akmajian and Frank Heny.: An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax. Cambridge:The MIT Press. (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. John A. Bateman and Stefan Momma.: The nondirectional representation of Systemic Functional Grammars and Semantics as Typed Feature Structures. ms. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joan Bresnan (Ed.).: The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chris Brew.: Partial Descriptions and Systemic Grammar. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (1990) 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bob Carpenter and Carl Pollard.: Inclusion, Disjointness and Choice: The Logic of Linguistic Classification. In Proceeding of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (1991) 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin Emele and Remi Zajac: Typed Unification Grammar. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (1990) 293–298

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.Gazdar, E.Klein, G.Pullum and I.Sag.: Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge:Harvard University Press (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.A.K.Halliday.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London:Edward Arnold (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.A.K. Halliday and J.R. Martin. (Eds.).: Readings in Systemic Linguistics. London:Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd. (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Masato Ishizaki.: A Bottom-up Generation for Principle-based Grammars Using Constraint Propagation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (1990) 188–193

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katheleen R. McKeown and Cecile L. Paris.: Functional Unification Revisited. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (1987) 97–103

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chris S. Mellish.: Implementing Systemic Classification By Unification. In Computational Linguistics 14(1) (1988) 40–51. (1991) 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  13. Terry Patten.: Systemic Text Generation as Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carl Pollard and Ivan A. Sag.: Information-Based Syntax and Semantics Volume 1. Number 13 of CSLI Lecture Notes (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carl Pollard and Ivan A. Sag.: Information-Based Syntax and Semantics Volume 2. ms. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stuart Shieber, Gertjan van Noord, Fernando C.N. Pereira and Robert C. Moore. Semantic-Head-Driven Generation. In Computational Linguistics 16(1) (1990) 30–42

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Uszkoreit. Categorial Unification Grammar. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (1986) 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.Zeevat, E.Klein and J.Calder.: Unification Categorial Grammar. In Haddock, Klein and Morrill (Eds.).: Categorial Grammar, Unification Grammar and Parsing. (1987) 195–222

    Google Scholar 

  19. Terry Winograd. Language as A Cognitive Process. London:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

R. Dale E. Hovy D. Rösner O. Stock

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masato, I. (1992). Syntactic selection in linguistic realization: A comparative study. In: Dale, R., Hovy, E., Rösner, D., Stock, O. (eds) Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. IWNLG 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 587. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55399-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55399-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55399-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47054-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics