Skip to main content

Theorem proving with ordering constrained clauses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction—CADE-11 (CADE 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 607))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We use clauses with ordering constraints to reduce the search space in ordered inference systems for clauses with or without equality, such as ordered resolution or superposition. In our completion procedure for ordering constrained clauses redundant inferences can be ignored and redundant clauses can be deleted without loosing refutational completeness. Two new results needed for fast ordering constraint solving and incrementality of the set of function symbols are given. We discuss the use of our methods for reasoning about infinite sets of clauses defined by a finite number of ordering constrained ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Bachmair, H. Ganzinger: On restrictions of ordered paramodulation with simplification. In Proc. 10th CADE, Kaiserslautern, LNCS 449, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Bachmair, H. Ganzinger: Rewrite-based equational theorem proving with selection and simplification, Report 208 Max-Planck Inst. Saarbrücken, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Comon: Solving Symbolic Ordering Constraints. In proc. 5th IEEE Symp. Logic in Comp. Sc. Philadelphia. (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Dershowitz, J-P. Jouannaud: Rewrite systems, in Handbook of Theoretical Comp. Sc. vol. B: Formal Methods and Semantics. North Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hsiang, M. Rusinowitch: Proving refutational completeness of theorem proving strategies: The transfinite semantic tree method. Submitted. (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Huet: Constrained Resolution: A complete method for higher-order logic. PhD. Thesis. Case Western Reserve University. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Hullot: Compilation de Formes Canoniques dans les Teories Equationnelles, These de 3eme Cycle, Universite de Paris Sud, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J-P. Jouannaud, M. Okada: Satisfiability of systems of ordinal notations with the subterm property is decidable, ICALP 1991, LNCS 510, Madrid, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.E. Knuth, P.B. Bendix: Simple word problems in universal algebras. J. Leech, editor, Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, 263–297, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Kirchner and H. Kirchner, M. Rusinowitch: Deduction with Symbolic Constraints, Revue Francaise d'Intelligence Artificielle, Vol 4, no. 3, pp. 9–52, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Nieuwenhuis, P. Nivela: Efficient deduction in equality Horn logic by Horn-completion, Information Processing Letters, no. 39, pp. 1–6, July 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Nieuwenhuis, F. Orejas: Clausal Rewriting, 2nd Intl. Workshop on Conditional and Typed Term Rewriting, Montreal LNCS 516, pp. 246–261, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Nieuwenhuis, F. Orejas, A. Rubio: TRIP: an implementation of clausal rewriting, Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Automated Deduction, Kaiserslautern, LNCS 449, pp. 667–668 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Nieuwenhuis, A. Rubio: Basic Superposition is Complete, Proc. European Symposium On Programming, Rennes, France, LNCS, February 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.E. Peterson: Complete Sets of Reductions with Constraints, Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Automated Deduction, Kaiserslautern, LNCS 449, pp. 381–395 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Rubio, R. Nieuwenhuis: Handling ordering constraints of clauses in theorem proving, Research Report LSI-UPC, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Zhang: Reduction, Superposition, and Induction: Automated Reasoning in an Equational Logic, PhD. Thesis, Renselaer Polytechnic Institute, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Deepak Kapur

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nieuwenhuis, R., Rubio, A. (1992). Theorem proving with ordering constrained clauses. In: Kapur, D. (eds) Automated Deduction—CADE-11. CADE 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55602-8_186

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55602-8_186

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55602-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47252-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics