Skip to main content

Fuzzy analogy based reasoning and classification of fuzzy analogies

  • Selected Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Learning Theory (AII 1994, ALT 1994)

Abstract

Conventional research on analogical reasoning (AR, for short) theory has not yet addressed the management of fuzzy matching between two different predicates, though human beings essentially utilize fuzzy matching when they infer analogically. On the other hand, fuzzy logic has been successfully applied to deductive and inductive reasoning to make them more flexible. Although the goal of both fuzzy logic and AR is to achieve more flexible human-like reasoning, there have been few applications of fuzzy logic to analogical reasoning. In this paper, fuzzy-analogy based reasoning (F-ABR), an extension of ABR, is proposed. In ABR, an analogy represents clear partial agreements between two knowledge areas, each of which is described as a set of predicates. In F-ABR, a knowledge area is a set of fuzzy predicates and a fuzzy analogy means fuzzy partial agreements between two knowledge areas. Using fuzzy logic, F-ABR can infer in a way that is more flexible and human-like than conventional ABR. This paper discusses three topics: first, a fuzzy matching method between two fuzzy predicate symbols is described. A fuzzy analogy contains a set of pairs composed of a predicate symbol and a similarity degree, and three methods for calculating the similarity degree are also described. Second, methods for classifying and ordering fuzzy analogies, based mainly on similarity degrees, are introduced. These methods are necessary when selecting a single fuzzy analogy to use in the reasoning process. Finally, the features of each type of fuzzy analogy are analyzed in order to show that many kinds of flexible reasoning can be achieved by selecting a fuzzy analogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. H. Winston:“Learning and Reasoning by Analogy”, Comm. ACM, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 689–703 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. A. Zadeh: Fuzzy Sets and Applications: Selected Papers by L. A. Zadeh (ed. R. R. Yager), John Wiley & Sons (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Haraguchi: “Towards a Mathematical Theory of Analogy”, Bull. of Inform. Cybernetics, Vol. 21, pp. 29–56 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Tano, W. Okamoto, and T. Iwatani: “New Design Concepts for the FLINS-Fuzzy Lingual System: Text-Based and Fuzzy-centered Architectures”, Proc. of Int'l Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 284–294 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Iwatani, S. Tano, and W. Okamoto:“F-CBR in Natural Language Communication System”, Proc. of ANZIIS-93, pp. 619–623 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Okamoto, S. Tano, and T. Iwatani: “Estimation of Fuzzy Quantifiers in FLINS”, Proc. of 1'st Asian Fuzzy Systems Symposium, pp. 1020–1028 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Dubois and H. Prade: Possibility Theory, Plenum Publishing Corp. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Setsuo Arikawa Klaus P. Jantke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iwatani, T., Tano, S., Inoue, A., Okamoto, W. (1994). Fuzzy analogy based reasoning and classification of fuzzy analogies. In: Arikawa, S., Jantke, K.P. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. AII ALT 1994 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 872. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58520-6_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58520-6_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58520-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49030-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics