Abstract
This research was conducted in order to evaluate 69 icons, which were designed to represent 23 telecommunications referents. Seven of these icons were previously proposed by the CIAJ (Communications Industry Association of Japan) Design Committee and the remaining 62 were designed by IDEO of London. Icons were tested via recognition and evaluation tasks. The data revealed that the icons with the highest mean recognition scores and evaluation ratings were usually those which tended to look like the item(s) that they were designed to represent. Icons that communicated their meaning through symbolic representations did not fare as well. Mean recognition scores and evaluation ratings for the 7 CIAJ icons varied.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bocker, M. (1992, May). Report about the results of an evaluation study of pictograms for point-to-point videotelephony. European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Work Item No: DTR/HF-1010.
Communication Industry of Japan (CIAJ). (1991, June). Supplementary information on new pictograms and symbols for telephones. CCITT, Delayed Contribution D265, Geneva, Switzerland.
Whitten, W. (1992, April). Procedures for designing, selecting, and evaluating symbols, pictograms, and icons. CCITT, Draft Recommendation F.910, Geneva, Switzerland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tudor, L.G. (1994). Growing an icon set: User acceptance of abstract and concrete icon styles. In: Blumenthal, B., Gornostaev, J., Unger, C. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. EWHCI 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 876. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58648-2_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58648-2_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58648-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49036-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive