Skip to main content

Use of hidden network structure in the set partitioning problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (IPCO 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 920))

  • 2056 Accesses

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the use of hidden network structure for the solution of set partitioning problems. By finding a hidden network row submatrix, the set partitioning problem is transformed to a network with side constraints. Flow conditions on the revealed pure network are then used in a procedure for effecting variable reduction for the set partitioning. By finding a hidden network column submatrix the set partitioning problem is transformed to a network with side columns. The resulting formulation is used in finding a feasible solution for the set partitioning problem quickly. Computational experience is included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, A. I., H. Han. 1994a. “Computational Implementation of Fujishige's Graph Realizability Algorithm,” Working Paper, School of Management, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali, A. I., H. Han. 1994b. “Extracting Hidden Network Submatrices of a (0,1) Matrix Using a PQ-graph,” Working Paper, School of Management, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ali, A. I., H. Thiagarajan. 1989. “A Network Relaxtion Based Enumeration Algorithm for Set Partioning,” European Journal of Operational Research, 38, 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avis, A. 1980. “A Note on Some Computationally Difficult Set Covering problems,” Mathematical Programming, 18, 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balas, E. 1980. “Cutting Planes from Conditional Bounds: A New Approach to Set Covering,” Mathematical Programming Study, 12, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balas, E., M. W. Padberg. 1979. Set Partioning — A Survey. In Combinatorial Optimization, Christofides, N., Mingozzi, P., Toth, P. and Sandi, C. (eds.). John Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartholdi, J. 1982. “A Good Submatrix is Hard to Find,” Operations Research Letters 1, 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bixby, R. E., R. Fourer. 1988. “Finding Embedded Network Rows in Linear Programs, I. Extraction Heuristics,” Management Science, 34, 342–376.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, G., D. Thomen. 1980. “Automatic Identification of Generalized Upper Bounds in Large-scale Optimization Models,” Management Science, 26, 1166–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, G., R. McBride, R. Wood. 1985. “Extracting Embedded Generalized Networks from Linear Programming Problems,” Mathematical Programming, 32, 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, G., W. Wright. 1984. “Automatic Identification of Embedded Network Rows in Large-scale Optimization Models,” Mathematical Programming, 29, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, T. J., C. A. Yano. 1992. “A Multiplier Adjustment Approach for the Set Partitioning Problem,” Operations Research, 40, Supp. 1, S40–S47.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Etcheberry, J. 1977. “The Set-Covering Problem: A New Implicit Enumeration Algorithm,” Operations Research, 25, 760–772.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher, M. L., P. Kedia. 1990. “Optimal Solution of Set Covering/Partioning Problems Using Dual Heuristics,” Management Science, 36, 674–688.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fujishige, S. 1980. “An Efficient PQ-Graph Algorithm for Solving the Graph Realization Problem,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 21, 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Graves, G., R. McBride, I. Gershkoff, D. Anderson, D. Mahidhara. 1993. “Flight Crew Scheduling,” Management Science, 39, 736–745.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gunawardane, G., S. Hoff, L. Schrage. 1981. “Identification of Special Structure Constraints in Linear Programs,” Mathematical Programming, 21, 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Han, Hyun-Soo, “Algorithms to Extract Hidden Networks and Applications to Set Partitioning Problems,” unpublished dissertation, University of Massahusetts at Amherst, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman, K. L., M. Padberg. 1993. “Solving Airline Crew-Scheduling Problems by Branch and Cut,” Management Science, 39, 657–682.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marsten, R. E. 1974. “An Algorithm for Large Set Partitioning Problems,” Management Science, 20, 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nemhauser, G. L., G. L. Weber. 1979. “Optimal Set Partionings and Lagrangean Duality,” Naval Research Logistics Quartely, 26, 553–563.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Padberg, M. W. 1973. “On the Facial Structure of Set Packing Polyhedra,” Mathematical Programming, 5, 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shepardson, F., R. E. Marsten. 1980. “A Lagrangean Relaxation Algorithm for the Two Duty Period Scheduling Problem,” Management Science, 26, 274–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Egon Balas Jens Clausen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ali, A.I., Han, HS., Kennington, J.L. (1995). Use of hidden network structure in the set partitioning problem. In: Balas, E., Clausen, J. (eds) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. IPCO 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 920. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59408-6_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59408-6_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59408-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49245-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics