Skip to main content

A new model of hard binary constraint Satisfaction Problems

  • Knowledge Representation I: Constraints
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artifical Intelligence (Canadian AI 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1081))

Abstract

The phase transition for randomly generated binary Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) has recently been investigated by Smith[10], Smith & Dyer[11], and Prosser[8, 9]. It was found that in most cases one can accurately predict where the phase transition occurs using a predictor based on the expected number of solutions. Their results are based on a parameterization of CSPs that has a global constraint tightness value, that is, each constraint has the same tightness. In this paper we generalize their results using a parameterization of CSPs that has local constraint tightness values. We give a refined version of their predictor which incorporates the local graph topology of each individual CSP. It is shown that there is a similar phase transition in which constraint tightness does not have to be a global value and that the refined predictor better predicts the location of this phase transition. We also show that random problems generated with the refined predictor are as hard or harder to search than problems generated with the old predictor. Our results indicate that harder phase transitions can be found for NP-complete problems by generalizing the parameterizations used to model the problem in appropriate ways to include the structure of an individual problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Cheeseman, B. Kanefsky, and W. Taylor. Where the really hard problems are. In Proceedings IJCAI-91, pages 331–337, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Crawford and L. Auton. Experimental results on the crossover point in satisfiability problems. In Proceedings AAAI-93, pages 21–27, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Dent and R. Mercer. Using local graph topology to model hard binary constraint satisfaction problems. Technical Report UWO-CSD-439, The University of Western Ontario, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Fu. The use and abuse of statistical mechanics in computational complexity. In D. Stein, editor, Lectures in the Sciences of Complexity, pages 815–826. Addison-Wesley Longman, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Haralick and G. Elliot. Increasing tree search efficiency for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 14:263–313, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Mitchell, B. Selman, and H. Levesque. Hard and easy distributions of SAT problems. In Proceedings AAAI-92, pages 459–465, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Prosser. Hybrid algorithms for the constraint satisfaction problem. Computational Intelligence, 9(3):268–299, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Prosser. Binary constraint satisfaction problems: Some are harder than others. In Proceedings ECAI-94, pages 95–99, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Prosser. An empirical study of phase transitions in binary constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 1996. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Smith. Phase transition and the mushy region in constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings ECAI-94, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Smith and M. Dyer. Locating the phase transition in binary constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 1996. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Tsang. Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction. Academic Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Williams and T. Hogg. Using deep structure to locate hard problems. In Proceedings AAAI-92, pages 472–477, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Williams and T. Hogg. Extending deep structure. In Proceedings AAAI-93, pages 152–157, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gordon McCalla

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dent, M.J., Mercer, R.E. (1996). A new model of hard binary constraint Satisfaction Problems. In: McCalla, G. (eds) Advances in Artifical Intelligence. Canadian AI 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1081. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61291-2_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61291-2_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61291-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68450-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics