Skip to main content

Analyzing the formation of structure in high-dimensional Self-Organizing Maps reveals differences to feature map models

  • Oral Presentations: Neurobiology Neurobiology II: Cortical Maps
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 96 (ICANN 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1112))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

We present a method for calculating phase diagrams for the high-dimensional variant of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM). The method requires only an ansatz for the tesselation of the data space induced by the map, not for the explicit state of the map. Using this method we analyze two recently proposed models for the development of orientation and ocular dominance column maps. The phase transition condition for the orientation map turns out to be of different form than of the corresponding low-dimensional map.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Maps, Springer, Berlin (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. von der Malsburg, Kybernetik 14, 85 (1973); Biol. Cyb. 32, 49 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. D. Miller, J. Neurosci. 14, 409 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Obermayer, H. Ritter, K. Schulten, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 8345 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.-U. Bauer, M. Riesenhuber, T. Geisel, submitted to Phys. Rev. Letters (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Riesenhuber, H.-U. Bauer, T. Geisel, submitted to Biol. Cyb. (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Erwin, K. Obermayer, K. Schulten, Biol. Cyb. 67, 47 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Obermayer, Adaptive Neuronale Netze und ihre Anwendung als Modelle der Entwicklung kortikaler Karten, infix Verlag, Sankt Augustin (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Obermayer, G. G. Blasdel, K. Schulten, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7568 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Pawelzik, H.-U. Bauer, F. Wolf, T. Geisel, Proc. ICANN 96, this volume (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. J. Goodhill, Biol. Cyb. 69, 109 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Löwel, J. Neurosci. 14, 7451 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. J. Goodhill, D. J. Willshaw, Network 1, 41 (1990); P. Dayan, Neur. Comp. 5, 392 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Riesenhuber, H.-U. Bauer, T. Geisel, submitted to CNS 96, Boston (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christoph von der Malsburg Werner von Seelen Jan C. Vorbrüggen Bernhard Sendhoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Riesenhuber, M., Bauer, HU., Geisel, T. (1996). Analyzing the formation of structure in high-dimensional Self-Organizing Maps reveals differences to feature map models. In: von der Malsburg, C., von Seelen, W., Vorbrüggen, J.C., Sendhoff, B. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 96. ICANN 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61510-5_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61510-5_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61510-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68684-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics