Skip to main content

A resolution theorem prover for intuitionistic logic

  • Session 1A
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction — Cade-13 (CADE 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1104))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We use the general scheme of building resolution calculi (also called the inverse method) originating from S.Maslov and G.Mints to design and implement a resolution theorem prover for intuitionistic logic. A number of search strategies are introduced and proved complete. The resolution method is shown to be a decision procedure for a new syntactically described decidable class of intuitionistic logic. The performance of our prover is compared with the performance of a tableau prover for intuitionistic logic presented in [12], using both the benchmarks from the latter and the theorems from J. von Plato-s constructive geometry [9].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beeson, M.J., Some applications of Gentzen's proof theory in automated deduction. Manuscript, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, C.L., Lee, R.C.T. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dyckoff, R. Contraction-free sequent calculi for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 57(3), 795–807 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fermüller, C., Leitsch, A., Tammet, T., Zamov, N. Resolution methods for decision problems. LNCS 679, Springer Verlag, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fitting, M. Resolution for Intuitionistic Logic. Paper presented at ISMIS '87, Charlotte, NC. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.Ju.Maslov An inverse method of establishing deducibility in the classical predicate calculus. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 159 (1964) 17–20=Soviet Math. Dokl. 5 (1964) 1420, MR 30 #3005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.Mints. Gentzen-type Systems and Resolution Rules. Part I. Propositional Logic. In COLOG-88, pages 198–231, LNCS 417, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.Mints. Resolution Strategies for the Intuitionistic Logic. In Constraint Programming, NATO ASI Series F, v. 131, pp. 289–311, Springer Verlag, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. von Plato. The Axioms of Constructive Geometry. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 76(2), 169–200 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pym, D.J., Wallen, L.A. Investigations into proof-search in a system of first-order dependent function types. In CADE-10, pages 236–250, Springer Verlag 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Robinson. A Machine-oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle. Journal of the ACM 12, 23–41 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.Sahlin, T.Franzen, S.Haridi. An Intuitionistic Predicate Logic Theorem Prover. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2(5), 619–656 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N.Shankar. Proof Search in the Intuitionistic Sequent Calculus. In CADE-11, pages 522–536, LNCS 607, Springer Verlag, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.Tammet. Proof Strategies in Linear Logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning 12(3), 273–304 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tammet, T., Smith, J. Optimised Encodings of Fragments of Type Theory in First Order Logic. In Proceedings of the CADE-12 workshop on proof search in type-theoretic languages, Nancy 1994, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Voronkov, A. Theorem proving in non-standard logics based on the inverse method. In CADE-11, pages 648–662, LNCS 607, Springer Verlag, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Volozh, B., Matskin, M., Mints, G., Tyugu, E. PRIZ system and the Propositional Calculus. Kibernetika and Software 6, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wallen, L.A. Automated Proof Search in Non-Classical Logics. MIT Press, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

M. A. McRobbie J. K. Slaney

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tammet, T. (1996). A resolution theorem prover for intuitionistic logic. In: McRobbie, M.A., Slaney, J.K. (eds) Automated Deduction — Cade-13. CADE 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1104. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61511-3_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61511-3_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61511-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68687-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics