Skip to main content

Contract-net-based learning in a user-adaptive interface agency

  • Learning About/From Other Agents and the World
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Artificial Intelligence Meets Machine Learning Learning in Multi-Agent Environments (LDAIS 1996, LIOME 1996)

Abstract

This paper describes a multi-agent learning approach to adaptation to users' preferences realized by an interface agency. Using a contract-net-based negotiation technique, agents as contractors as well as managers negotiate with each other to pursue the overall goal of dynamic user adaptation. By learning from indirect user feedback, the adjustment of internal credit vectors and the assignment of contractors that gained maximal credit with respect to the user's current preferences, the preceding session, and current situational circumstances can be realized. In this way, user adaptation is achieved without accumulating explicit user models but by the use of implicit, distributed user models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chin, D.N. Intelligent Interfaces as Agents. In Sullivan, J.W. & Tyler, S.W. (eds.): Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 177–206). New York: ACM Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, R., Smith, G. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. In Bond, A.H. and Gasser, L. (eds.): Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (pp. 333–356). Morgan Kaufmann, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dowell, M.L. Learning in Multiagent Systems. Ph.D. Thesis at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of South Carolina, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jörding, T., Wachsmuth, I. An Anthropomorphic Agent for the Use of Spatial Language. To be published in Olivier, P. & Maass, W. (eds.): Vision and Language, Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kay, A. User Interface: A Personal View. In Laurel, B. (ed.): The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 191–208). Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lashkari, Y., Metral, M., Maes, P. Collaborative Interface Agents. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laurel, B. Interface agents: Metaphors with character. In Laurel, B. (Ed.): The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 355–365). Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lenzmann, B., Wachsmuth, I. A User-Adaptive Interface Agency for Interaction with a Virtual Environment. In Weiss, G. & Sen, S. (eds.): Adaption and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 140–151). Berlin: Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lenzmann, B., Wachsmuth, I., Cao, Y. An Intelligent Interface for a Virtual Environment. KI-NRW (Applications of Artificial Intelligence in North-Rine Westphalia) Report 95-01, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maes, P. Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload. Communications of the ACM 37(7), 1994, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maes, P., Kozierok, R. Learning interface agents. In Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 459–465). AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McTear, M.F. User modelling for adaptive computer systems: a survey of recent developments. Artificial Intelligence Review 7, 1993, 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell, T., Caruana, R., Freitag, D., McDermott, J., Zabowski, D. Experiences with a learning personal assistent. Communications of the ACM 37(7), 1994, 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norman, D.A. How Might People Interact with Agents. Communications of the ACM 37(7), 1994, 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ohko, T., Hiraki, K., Anzai, Y. Learning to Reduce Communication Cost on Task Negotiation among Multiple Autonomous Mobile Robots. In Weiss, G. & Sen, S. (eds.): Adaption and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 177–190). Berlin: Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Retz-Schmidt, G. Various views on spatial prepositions. AI magazine 9(2), 1988, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Selker, T. Coach: A Teaching Agent that Learns. Communications of the ACM 37(7), 1994, 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wachsmuth, I., Cao, Y. Interactive Graphics Design with Situated Agents. In W. Strasser & F. Wahl (eds.): Graphics and Robotics (pp. 73–85). Berlin: Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wachsmuth, I., Lenzmann, B., Jörding, T., Jung, B., Latoschik, M., Fröhlich, M. A Virtual Interface Agent und its Agency. Poster contribution to the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Agents-97.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weiß, G. Adaptation and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems: Some Remarks and a Bibliography. In Weiß, G. & Sen, S. (eds.): Adaption and Learning in Multi-Agent Systems. Berlin: Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gerhard Weiß

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lenzmann, B., Wachsmuth, I. (1997). Contract-net-based learning in a user-adaptive interface agency. In: Weiß, G. (eds) Distributed Artificial Intelligence Meets Machine Learning Learning in Multi-Agent Environments. LDAIS LIOME 1996 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1221. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62934-3_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62934-3_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62934-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69050-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics