Skip to main content

Knowing and Indexical Psychology

  • Chapter
Rethinking Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Information Science and Knowledge Management ((ISKM,volume 12))

Abstract

This chapter has two parts. The first part critiques mentalism in cognitive psychology and Knowledge Management theory’s basis in mentalism. The second part proposes a reading of indexical psychology as an alternative to mentalism. The purpose of the chapter is to reposition our understanding of psychological events, including personal knowledge expressions, from a mysticism of private minds and their public representations to a conception of human agency constructing person and self through cultural forms and in social situations. Such an analysis leads to a breakdown of the “inner” and “outer” dichotomy which has formed the basis for much of psychological theory and for Knowledge Management theory (the latter in terms of a dichotomized notion of private knowledge and public mediums for that knowledge’s representation). The view proposed here is that psychological research, including research into knowing acts, must begin with the understanding of persons and their selves as dynamically constructed by learning and by experience. In this way, this analysis also is associated with what is sometimes referred to as “activity theory.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belkin, N.J. (1977). Internal knowledge and external information. In M. de Mey & J. Piaget (Eds.), CC 77: The cognitive viewpoint (pp.187–194). Gent: University of Gent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, N.J. (1990). The cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science, 16, 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D.C. (2006). Wittgenstein, language and information: “Back to the rough ground!” Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briet, S. (2006). What is documentation? Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, B.C. (1980). The foundations of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, R.E. (2005). Clearing up ‘implicit knowledge’: implications for knowledge management, information science, psychology,, and social epistemology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (6), 630–635.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frohmann, B. (1992). The power of images: a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 48 (4), 365–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohmann, B. (2004). Deflating Information: From Science Studies to Documen-tation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A.M. (1997). What memory is for? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1), 1–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A.M., & Robertson, D.A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28 (1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A.M., & Robertson, D.A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: a comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1989). The self as a theoretical concept. In M. Krausz (Ed.), Relativism: interpretation and confrontation (pp. 387–417). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Tissaw, M. A. (2005). Wittgenstein and psychology: a practical guide. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. & Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn: integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlhäusler, P. & Harrè, R. (1990). Pronouns and people: the linguistic construction of social and personal identity. With the assistance of Anthony Holiday and Michael Freyne. Oxford: B. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, M.J. (1979). The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1992). Last writings on the philosophy of psychology: the inner and the outer, volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Day, R.E. (2007). Knowing and Indexical Psychology. In: McInerney, C.R., Day, R.E. (eds) Rethinking Knowledge Management. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-71011-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-71011-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71010-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71011-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics