Skip to main content

Kleene's theorem revisited

  • Chapter 1 VLSI And Formal Languages
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends, Techniques, and Problems in Theoretical Computer Science (IMYCS 1986)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 281))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The analysis of the famous Kleene's theorem shows that it consists indeed in two different propositions that are better distinguished when one tries to generatize the result. The first one relates rational expressions and a suitable generalization of finite automata. It holds in any monoid or, even better, in the semiring of formal power series on any monoid. It is shown that several classical results in formal language theory, for instance Elgot and Mezei characterization of rational relations by transducers and Chomsky normal form for context-free grammars, can thus be seen as particular cases of this first half of Kleene's theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Berstel, Transductions and Context free Languages, Teubner, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Berstel, Ch. Reutenauer, Les séries rationnelles et leurs languages, Masson, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. H. Conway, Regular Algebra and Finite Machines, Chapman and Hall, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Eilenberg, Automata, languages, and Machines, Vol. A, Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. C. Elgot and G. Mezei, On relations defined by generalized finite automata, I.B.M. J. of Res. and Dev. 9, 1965, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation, Addison Wesley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman, Formal Languages and their relation to Automata, Addison Wesley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. C. Kleene, Representation of Events in Nerve Nets and Finite Automata, in Automata Studies (C. E. Shannon and J. Mc Carty, Eds), Princeton University Press, 1956, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Nivat, Transductions des languages de Chomsky, Ann. Inst. Fourier 18, 1968, 336–456.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Sakarovitch, Théorie des Automates, en préparation.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. P. Schützenberger, Certain elementary families of automata, in Proceedings of Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Automata, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, 1962, 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Shamir, A representation theorem for algebraic and context free power series in non commuting variables, Inform. and Control 11, 1967, 234–254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alica Kelemenová Jozef Kelemen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sakarovitch, J. (1987). Kleene's theorem revisited. In: Kelemenová, A., Kelemen, J. (eds) Trends, Techniques, and Problems in Theoretical Computer Science. IMYCS 1986. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 281. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3540185356_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3540185356_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18535-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48008-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics