Abstract
I doubt whether in the Netherlands at this time there is really an alternative to euthanasia. Any alterations we could effect would be more in terms of emphasis than real alternatives. With the social, ethical, and legal developments over the last twenty-five years, there has grown in our society a ready acceptance of the possibility of euthanasia for releasing people from suffering. From an official Catholic perspective, this development was a wrong step. It is a wrong answer to the wrong question. Instead the central question for society and healthcare institutions should have been how should we deal with suffering? This suffering is enhanced by growing possibilities in medical technology. That should have been the basic starting point. As it turned out, however, the starting point for the euthanasia discussion in the Netherlands was the conflict of duties for health professionals at a moment of intractable suffering in persons who were under their care when those persons explicitly requested euthanasia. The question turned on how to eliminate suffering rather than how to confront it and deal with it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pijnenburg, M.A.M. (2002). Catholic Healthcare and the Dutch National Character. In: Thomasma, D.C., Kimbrough-Kushner, T., Kimsma, G.K., Ciesielski-Carlucci, C. (eds) Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5185-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46863-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive