Skip to main content

Methods for Forecasting from Intentions Data

  • Chapter
Principles of Forecasting

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 30))

Abstract

Intentions are measures of individuals’ plans, goals, or expectations about what they will do in the future and are often used to forecast what people will do in the future. I develop nine principles from past studies of the predictive accuracy of intentions data that concern how to measure intentions, how to best use intentions to forecast, and reasons why forecasters should be cautious when using intentions. The principles relating to intentions measurement state that intentions should be measured using probability scales and that respondents should be instructed to focus on their own individual characteristics when responding to intentions questions. The principles relating to using intentions to forecast behavior state that intentions need to be adjusted to remove biases, that respondents should be segmented prior to adjusting intentions, and that intentions can be used to develop best- and worst-case forecasts. Further, one principle states that more reliance should be placed on predictions from intentions for behaviors in which respondents have previously participated. Finally, the principles relating to why researchers should be cautious when using intentions data state that researchers should be aware that measuring intentions can change behavior and that respondents who recall the time of their last purchase inaccurately may make biased predictions of their future purchases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, J. S. (1985), Long-range Forecasting (2“d ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., V. G. Morwitz, & V. Kumar (2000), “Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy?” International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 383–397. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. & T. Overton (1971), “Brief vs. comprehensive descriptions in measuring intentions to purchase,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 114–117. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemmaor, A. C. (1995), “Predicting behavior from intention-to-buy measures: The parametric case,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 176–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, M. & A. S. C. Ehrenberg (1966), “Intentions-to-buy and claimed brand usage,” Opera-dons Research Quarterly, 17 (March), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D., B. Gan, P. Gendall & D. Esslemont (1991), “Predicting purchase behavior,” Marketing Bulletin, 2, 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, P. S. & B. G. S. Hardie (2001), “Principles for forecasting the sales of new consumer packaged goods products,” in J.S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & I. Ajzen (1975), Belief Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, G. & V. G. Morwitz (1996), “The effect of measuring intent on brand level purchase behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L. F. & F. M. Bass (1989), “Adjusting stated intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 336–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T. (1966), “Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 658–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalwani, M. U. & A. J. Silk (1982), “On the reliability and predictive validity of purchase intention measures,” Marketing Science, 1, 243–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. R. & B. J. Lansing (1955), “Decisions to purchase consumer durable goods,” Journal of Marketing, 20 (2), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., B. Elango & S. P. Schnaars (1997), “The accuracy of the Conference Board’s buying plans index: A comparison of judgmental vs. extrapolation forecasting methods,” International Journal of Forecasting, 13, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. Y. S. (1986), “Estimating sales volume potential for new innovative products with case histories,” Proceedings of the ESOMAR Conference, Monte Carlo, September 14–18, 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (1990), “The use of intentions data to predict behavior: A best case analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 934–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, J. (1974), “Federal programs to measure consumer purchase expectations, 194673: A post-mortem,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miniard, P. W., C. Obermiller & T. J. Page (1982), “Predicting behavior with intentions: A comparison of conditional versus direct measures,” Advances in Consumer Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Vol. 9, A. A. Mitchell (ed.), Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. G. (1979), “Purchase intentions and purchase behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 43, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, V. G. (1997), “It seems like only yesterday: The nature and consequences of telescoping errors in marketing research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, V.G., E. Johnson & D.C. Schmittlein (1993), “Does measuring intent change behavior?” Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, V. G. & D. Schmittlein (1992), “Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which `intenders’ actually buy?” Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, T. M. & J. S. Shrauger (1986), “Self-prediction: Exploring the parameters of accuracy,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1044–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. E. (1966), “Jet set, pseudo-store, and new product testing,” Journal ofMarketing Research, 3, 372–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, P. (1979), “Certain problems in election survey methodology,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, L. G., R. D. Wilson & E. I. Brody, (1982), “NEWS: A decision-oriented model for new product analysis and forecasting,” Marketing Science, 1, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewall, M. A. (1981), “Relative information contributions of consumer purchase intentions and management judgment as explanators of sales,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., J. Hartwick & P. R. Warshaw (1988), “The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S.J. (1980), “On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, A. D. & W. G. Hall (1986), “Pretest market models: A critical evaluation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3, 86–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, A.J. & G. L. Urban (1978), “Pre-test market evaluation of new product goods: A model and measurement methodology,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. & R. F. Kosobud (1968), “How informative are consumer buying intention surveys?” Review of Economics and Statistics, 50, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1959), “On the predictive value of consumer intentions and attitudes,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 41, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. L. (1965), “Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, P. R. (1980), “Predicting purchase and other behaviors from general and contextually specific intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, P. R. & F. D. Davis (1985), “The accuracy of behavioral intention versus behavioral expectation for prediction behavioral goals,” Journal of Psychology, 119 (6), 599–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D. & S. J. LaFleur (1995), “Knowing what you’ll do: Effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, D. R. & T. Bergestuen (2001), “Forecasting with conjoint analysis,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morwitz, V.G. (2001). Methods for Forecasting from Intentions Data. In: Armstrong, J.S. (eds) Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7401-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47630-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics