Skip to main content
  • 1509 Accesses

Abstract

Oncologic reconstruction of head and neck cancers, breast cancers, and trunk and extremity cancers has become routine in most academic and larger community medical centers. Reconstruction of many of these oncologic defects can be performed using either autogenous tissue or alloplastic materials. Although there are usually clear indications for the use of either of these basic methods, autogenous reconstructions are usually preferred. Autogenous tissue has the advantage of “replacing like with like,” creating a more natural reconstructive result with long-term predictability. Autogenous reconstructions are less likely to result in late infectious sequellae including wound infection, implant exposure, and implant failure as can be seen in alloplastic reconstructions. For breast reconstruction, two primary methods of reconstruction exist: implant reconstruction and autogenous reconstruction. Although there are relative contraindications for each of these methods in selected patients, most patients are candidates for either method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buncke HJ, Buncke CM, Schulz WP. Experimental digital amputation and replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965;36:62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen ZW, Chen YC, Pao YS. Salvage of the forearm following complete traumatic amputation. Clin Med J 1963;82:632.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kleinert HE, Kardan ML, Romero JL. Small blood vessel anastomosis for salvage of severely injured upper extremity. J Bone Joint Surg 1963;45:788.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel RK, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of an island flap by microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;52:111–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McLean DH, Buncke HJ. Autotransplantation of omentum to scalp defect with microsurgical revascularization. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;49:268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan EL, Buncke HJ, Murray DE. Distant transfer of cutaneous island flaps in humans by microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;52:301–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Glicksman A, Ferder M, Casale P, Posner J, Kim R, Strauch B. 1457 years of microsurgical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:355–363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khouri RK, Benes CO, Ingram D, et al. Outcome date from a prospective survey of 486 microvascular free flaps. Proceedings of the 75th ASPS Meeting, Hilton Head, SC, May 5–8,1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, et al. Choice of flaps and incidence of free flap success. Plast Reconst Surg 1996;98:459–463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmstrom H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction: An experimental study and clinical case report. Scan J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;13:423–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman Rj, Argenta LC, Anderson R. Deep inferior epigastric free flap for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:455–460.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:828–841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Serletti JM, Deuber MA, Guidera PM, Reading G. Comparison of the operating microscope and loupes for free microvascular tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:27–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnez ZM, Khan U, Pogurelec D, Planinseh F. Rational selection of flaps from the abdomen in breast reconstruction to reduce donor site morbidity. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:351–354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartrampf CR, Bennett GK. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient: a critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg 1987;205:508–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheflan M, Dinner MI. The transverse abdominal island flap: I. Indications, contraindications, results, and complications. Ann Plast Surg 1983;10:24–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hochberg M, Perlmutter D, Medsger T, et al. Lack of association between augmentation mammoplasty and systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:1125–1131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewin S, Miller T. A review of epidemiologic studies analyzing the relationship between breast implants and connective tissue disease. Plast Recon Surg 1997;100:1309–1313.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlson EW, Hankinson SE, Liang MH, et al. Association of silicone breast implants with immunologic abnormalities: a prospective study. Am J Med 1995;106:11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bailey MN, Smith JW, Caras L, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction: reducing the risks. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:845–851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with silicone-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:930–942.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Collis N, Sharpe DT. Breast reconstruction by tissue expansion: a retrospective technical review of 197 two-staged delayed reconstructions following mastectomy for malignant breast disease in 189 patients. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:37–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeh KA, Lyle C, Wei JP, Sherry R. Immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer: morbidity and outcome. Am Surg 1998;64:1195–1199.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, Beran SJ, et al. An analysis of silicone gel-filled breast implants: diagnosis and failure rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:2304–2308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Place MJ, Song T, Hardesty RA, Henricks DL. Sensory reinnervation of autologous tissue TRAM flaps after breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1997;38:19–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lieu S, Hunt J, Penning MD. Sensory recovery following free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1996;49:210–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cederna PS, Yates WR, Chang P, et al. Postmastectomy reconstruction: Comparative analysis of the psychosocial functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominus flap versus breast implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1995;35:458–468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Serletti JM, Moran SL, Orlando GS, Fox I. Thoracodorsal vessels as recipient vessels for the free TRAM in delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1649–1655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Serletti, J.J. (2008). Breast Reconstruction. In: Butler, C.E., Fine, N.A. (eds) Principles of Cancer Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49504-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49504-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-49502-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-49504-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics