Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing Survival Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis

  • Chapter
Nolph and Gokal's Textbook of Peritoneal Dialysis

  • 1580 Accesses

Since the emergence of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a widely used, feasible, and successful home-based therapy in the 1980s, there has inevitably been interest in comparing outcomes on this modality with those on hemodialysis (HD). Many studies have been done comparing costs of treatment, quality of life, and hospitalization and results have been variable [1–12]. Most important and most controversial, however, have been the studies that have attempted to compare patient survival on PD to that on HD [13–27].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Habach G, Bloembergen WE, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA, Port FK. Hospitalization among United States dialysis patients: hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 5:1940–1948.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy SW, Foley RN, Barrett BJ, et al. Comparative hospitalization of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Canada. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 2557–2563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kutner NG, Zhang R, Barnhart H, Collins AJ. Health Status and quality of life reported by incident patients after 1 year on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 2159–2167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu AW, Fink NE, Marsh-Manzi VR, Meyer KB, Finkelstein FO, Chapman MM, Powe NR. Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures. J Am Soc Nephrol 15; 15: 743–753.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Merkus MP, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Stevens P, Krediet RT. Quality of life in patients on chronic dialysis: self-assessment 3 months after the start of treatment. The NECOSAD Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 29: 584–592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simmons RG, Anderson C, Kamstra L. Comparison of quality of life of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, and after transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 1984; 4: 253–255.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manns B, Johnson JA, Taub K, Mortis G, Ghaly WA, Donaldson C. Quality of life in patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis: what are the important determinants? Clin Nephrol 2003; 60: 341–351.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Vecchi AF, Dratwa M, Wiedemann ME. Healthcare systems and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies – an international review: costs and reimbursement/funding of ESRD therapies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14 Suppl 6: 31–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. USRDS US Renal Data System, USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report. Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Chapter 11. Costs of Chronic Kidney Disease and End Stage Renal Disease. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases: Bethesda, MD, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, et al. Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40 (3): 611–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goeree R, Manalich J, Grootendorst P, Beecroft ML, Churchill DN. Cost analysis of dialysis treatments for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Clin Invest Med 1995; 18 (6): 455–464.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salonen T, Reina T, Oksa H, Sintonen H, Pasternack A. Cost analysis of renal replacement therapies in Finland. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: 1228–1238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA. A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 177–183.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vonesh EF, Moran J. Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 354–365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30: 334–342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaubel DE, Morrisson HI, Fenton SS. Comparing mortality rates on CAPD/CCPD and hemodialysis. The Canadian experience: fact or fiction? Perit Dial Int 1998; 18: 478–484.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Collins AJ, Hao W, Xia H, et al. Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34: 1065–1074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ganesh SK, Hulbert-Shearon T, Port FK, et al. Mortality differences by dialysis modality among Incident ESRD patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14: 415–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stack AG, Molony DA, Rahman NS, et al. Impact of dialysis modality on survival of new ESRD patients with congestive heart failure in the United States. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1071–1079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ. The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 2389–2401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 112–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liem YS, Wong JB, Hunink MG, de Charro FT, Winkelmayer WC. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in The Netherlands. Kidney Int 2007; 71 (2): 153–158. Epub 29 Nov 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Locatelli F, Marcelli D, Conte F, et al. Survival and development of cardiovascular disease by modality of treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2411–2417.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Korevaar JC, Feith GW, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Boeschoten EW, Bossuyt PM, Krediet RT; NECOSAD Study Group. Effect of starting with hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis in patients new on dialysis treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 2222–2228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murphy SW, Foley RN, Barrett BJ, et al. Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 1720–1726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaar BG, Coresh J, Plantinga LC, et al. Comparing the risk of death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med2005; 143:174–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2851–2860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blake PG, Finkelstein FO. Why is the proportion of patients doing peritoneal dialysis declining in North America? Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 107–114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Debacquer D, De Backer G, Lameire N. Comparison of survival on CAPD and haemodialysis: statistical pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 307–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Mittleman MA, Levin R, Pleskey JS, Avorn J. Comparing mortality of elderly patients on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score approach. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 2353–2362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ. Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: what do they tell us? Kidney Int 2006; 70: S3–S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bargman JM. Is there more to living than not dying? A reflection on survival studies in dialysis. Semin Dial 2007; 20: 50–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Longnecker JC, Coresh J, Klag MJ, Levey AS, Martin AA, Fink NE, Powe N. Validation of comorbid conditions on the end-stage renal disease medical evidence report: the CHOICE study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 520–529.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bargman JM. Worshipping at the altar of St. Cox: who adjusts the adjustments? Perit Dial Int 2006; 26: 426–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. D’Agostino RB Jr. Tutorial in biostatistics. Propensity score methods for a bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.Stat Med 1998; 17: 2265–2281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ho YW, Chau KF, Leung CB, Choy BY, Tsang WK, Wong PN, Cheng YL, Lai Wm, Yong DSP, Kwan TH, Lui SF. Hong Kong Registry Report. Hong Kong J Nephrol 2004;7: 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. US Renal Data System, USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report. Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Chapter 4. Treatment Modalities. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases: Bethesda, MD, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SS. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1517–1524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Churchill DN, Thorpe KE, Keshaviah PK. Lower probability of patient survival with continuous peritoneal dialysis in the United States compared with Canada. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8: 965–971.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Biesen W, Vanholder RC, Veys N, Dhondt A, Lameire NH. An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11 (1): 116–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Blake PG. Integrated end-stage renal disease care: the role of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16 Suppl 5: 61–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Piraino B. The Choice Study. Perit Dial Int 2006; 26: 423–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lo WK. Randomized control trial versus retrospective data. Semin Dial 2007; 20: 213–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Garcia-Garcia G, Monteon-Ramos JF, Garcia-Bejarano H, Gomez-Navarro B, Reyes IH, Lomeli AM, Palomeque M, Cortes-Sanabria L, Breien-Alcaraz H, Ruiz-Morales NM. Renal replacement therapy among disadvantaged populations in Mexico: a report from the Jalisco Dialysis and Transplant Registry (REDTJAL). Kidney Int Suppl 2005; 97: S58–S61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Van Laecke S, Veys N, Vekbeke F, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W. The fate of older diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis: myths and mysteries and suggestions for further research. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27 (6): 611–618.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professor of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario

    K.E. Yeates & P.G. Blake

Authors
  1. K.E. Yeates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P.G. Blake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P.G. Blake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine Department of Medicine Division of Nephrology, MA436 Health Sciences Center, Columbia, MO 65212, USA

    Ramesh Khanna

  2. Academic Medical Center Dept. Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Raymond T. Krediet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yeates, K., Blake, P. (2009). Comparing Survival Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis. In: Khanna, R., Krediet, R.T. (eds) Nolph and Gokal's Textbook of Peritoneal Dialysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78940-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78940-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-78939-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-78940-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation