Skip to main content

Crime and Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of European Societies

Abstract

This chapter examines trends in crime and criminal justice in Europe, the nature of European criminology and the research topics of interest to criminologists who study European societies. It is highly ironic that although criminology as a discipline clearly stems from the European intellectual tradition, present-day European criminology struggles for its own identity and recognition. This chapter therefore examines current issues in European criminology as framed by the history of the discipline in Europe and its subsequent development across the Atlantic. We will also contextualize this chapter by discussing crime and criminal justice in Europe as influenced by trends and pressures towards convergence or divergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, homicide may or may not include “vehicular homicide”, infanticide and assaults resulting in death; burglary may or may not include cases where the offender entered through an open door or window, and assault may or may not require a certain degree of injury.

  2. 2.

    The term “transnational crime” is coming into general usage to refer to an offence with a point of contact in two or more countries. For example, an offender may cross a border in order to commit a crime (as with drug trafficking, smuggling or trafficking in persons) or to flee justice. Another example is where an offender commits an offence in one country that has an effect in another country (cybercrime, international fraud and money laundering). The term has been developed primarily to maintain a distinction with international crimes, which are widely understood to be offences that are so serious that most if not all countries agree internationally on measures for their prevention and for bringing the offenders to justice. Prime examples of international crimes are war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.

  3. 3.

    A possible source of confusion: the Council of Europe and the European Union are different inter-governmental organizations. The European Union currently consists of 27 Member States and covers most of Western and Central Europe. Its top decision-making body is called the European Council of Ministers, or the European Council for short. The Council of Europe, in turn, today has 44 Member States and covers almost all of Europe, East and West, North and South.

  4. 4.

    More formally known as the European Communities.

  5. 5.

    As can be assumed, Member States have different views on where, exactly, the border lies between the maintenance of law and order on one hand and cooperation in policing and in criminal matters on the other.

  6. 6.

    The requirement of double criminality is strongly entrenched in international cooperation in criminal matters. In essence, it means that country A will not provide assistance or extradite a suspect to country B for an offence, unless this is an offence also in country A.

  7. 7.

    Along much the same lines, the Hague program (which followed the Tampere program) states that the approximation of substantive criminal law facilitates mutual recognition of judgements and judicial decisions and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters having a cross-border dimension (Section 3.3.2).

  8. 8.

    At the time of this writing, the results of the referendum in Ireland in June 2008 mean that the European Union will once again have to enter into a “period of reflection”. Several outcomes are possible, ranging from totally abandoning the Lisbon Treaty, to making some slight adjustments, and holding a new referendum in Ireland. Even if the Lisbon Treaty is abandoned, however, the problems will remain in EU decision-making, and undoubtedly the search for a solution in respect of cooperation in policing and criminal justice would follow the same general lines.

References

  • Aebi, Marcelo and Delgrande, Natalia (2008) Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics SPACE 1. pc-cp\space\documents\pc-cp (2007) 09 rev3. Available athttp://www.coe.int

  • Aebi, Marcelo, Aromaa, Kauko, Aubusson de Cavarley, Bruno, Barclay, Gordon, Gruszczyñska, Beata, von Hofer, Hanns, Hysi, Vasilika, Jehle, Jorg-Martin, Killias, Martin, Smit, Paul, Tavares, Cynthia (2006) European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics, third edition. The Hague: WODC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aromaa, Kauko and Heiskanen, Markku (eds) (2008) Crime and Criminal Justice Systems in Europe and North America 1995-2004, HEUNI publication no. 55, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, Jan van, Manchin, Robert, van Kesteren, John, Nevala, Sami and Hideg, Gergely (2007)The Burden of Crime in the European Union. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gallup-europe.be/euics/Xz38/downloads/EUICS%20-%20The%20Burden%20of%20Crime%20in%20the%20EU.pdf

  • Johnson, Holly, Ollus, Natalia, and Nevala, Sami (2007)Violence Against Women: An International Perspective. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, Josine (2001) ‘Similarity and Difference’. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9/3, 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killias, Martin (2001) ‘Europe’s voice in the criminological concert.’European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 9/3:327–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killias, Martin and Aebi, Marcelo (2000) ‘Crime trends in Europe from 1990 to 1996: how Europe illustrates the limits of the American experience’.European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research,8(1): 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombroso, Cesare, Ferrero, Guglielmo, Rafter, Nicola Hahn and Gibson, Mary (2004) Criminal Woman, the Prostitute, and the Normal Woman. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Ineke Haen, (2001) The criminological enterprise in Europe and the United States: a contextual explanation, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9 235–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina-Ariza, Juan, (2006) Politics of crime in Spain, 1978-2004, Punishment and Society, 8 183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monar, Jörg, (2006) Cooperation in the justice and home affairs domain: characteristics, constraints and progress, European Integration, 28 495–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, Tim (2002) ‘Atlantic Crossings: “Policy transfer” and Crime Control in the USA and Britain.’Punishment and Society. 4/2:165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, Nicole Hahn. (2005) “Cesare Lombroso and the Origins of Criminology: Rethinking Criminological Tradition,” Chapter 2.1 (pp. 33–42) in Stuart Henry and Mark Lanier,The Essential Criminology Reader. Boulder, CO: Westview/Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Hans-Joachim (2001) ‘In Need of a European Criminology.’European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 9/3:331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, Cynthia and Thomas, Geoffrey (2008) Statistics in Focus: Crime and Criminal Justice. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available athttp://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-08-019/EN/KS-SF-08-019-EN.PDF

  • Tham, Henrik (2001) ‘The Need for a European Criminology?’European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 9/3:345–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2004) 2004 Corruption Perceptions Index.http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2004.

  • van Stokkom, Bas (2001) ‘European Criminology and European Identity: Some Considerations.’European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 9/3:339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Lampe, Klaus (2005) ‘Organized crime in Europe’, in Philip Reichel (ed.)Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 403–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, Lode (2001) ‘Contextualising Criminology: Some Brief Reflections.’European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 9/3: 349–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsmley, Roy (2007) World Prison Population List (seventh edition). London, UK: International Centre for Prison Studies, King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rosemary Barberet or Matti Joutsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barberet, R., Joutsen, M. (2010). Crime and Justice. In: Immerfall, S., Therborn, G. (eds) Handbook of European Societies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88199-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics