A case study of the concept maps of two pre-service teachers illustrates the potential of concept mapping to the teacher educator. The maps reveal much about whether future secondary teachers grasp the nature of mathematics as a conceptual system, understand the conceptual content of mathematical procedures, and possess the requisite pedagogical content knowledge to mediate such understandings to future learners. The map of one of the two teachers reveals that she possesses these understandings. The map of the other shows a formalistic understanding of mathematics. Concept mapping also functions as an epistemological heuristic for pre- and in-service teachers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davydov, V. V. (1992). The psychological analysis of multiplication procedures. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 14(1), 3–67.
Karpinski, L. C. (1915). Robert of Chester’s Latin translation of the algebra of Al-Khowarizmi. New York: Macmillan.
Morrow, L. J. (1998). Whither algorithms? Mathematics educators express their views. In L. J. Morrow & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), The teaching and learning of algorithms in school mathematics (pp. 1–6). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Morrow, L. J., & Kenney, M. J. (Eds.) (1998). The teaching and learning of algorithms in school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of mathematics. The American Educator, 26(2), 10–26.
Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural-historical theory and mathematics education. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, S. Miller, & V. Ageyev (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 225–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmittau, J. (2004). Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy. European Journal of Psychology of Education XIX(1), 19–43.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wu, H. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education. American Educator, Fall Issue, 1–7.
Acknowledgements
My thanks to James J. Vagliardo for his expert assistance in digitizing the concept mapping sections, and to the two pre-service teachers who graciously provided the concept maps discussed in this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmittau, J. (2009). Concept Mapping as a Means to Develop and Assess Conceptual Understanding in Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education. In: Afamasaga-Fuata'i, K. (eds) Concept Mapping in Mathematics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89194-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89194-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-89193-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-89194-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)