Skip to main content

Two-Way Crossed Classification without Interaction

  • Chapter
Analysis of Variance for Random Models

Abstract

The one-way classification discussed in Chapter 2 involved the levels of only a single factor. It is the simplest model in terms of experimental layout, assumptions, computations, and analyses. However, in many investigations, it is desirable to measure response at combinations of levels of two or more factors considered simultaneously. Two factors are said to be crossed if the data contain observations at each combination of a level of one factor with a level of the other factor. Consider two factors A and B, where a levels are sampled from a large population of levels of A and b levels are sampled from a large population of levels of B, and one observation is made on each of the ab cells. This type of layout is commonly known as the balanced two-way crossed random model with one observation per cell. It can also be viewed as a randomized complete block design where both blocks and treatments are regarded as random.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • R. Ahmad and S. M. Mostafa (1987), Empirical Bayes estimation of variance components in balanced random models, J. Statist. Comput. SimuL, 27, 143–153.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Andrews and A. Herzberg (1985), Data: A Collection of Problems from Many Fields for Students and Research Workers, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Arteaga, S. Jeyaratnam, and F. A. Graybill (1982), Confidence intervals for proportions of total variance in the two-way cross component of variance model, Comm. Statist. A Theory Methods, 11, 1643–1658.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Burdick and F. A. Graybill (1992), Confidence Intervals on Variance Components, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R. R. Corbeil and S. R. Searle (1976), A comparison of variance component estimators, Biometrics, 32, 779–791.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • O. L. Davies and P. L. Goldsmith, eds. (1972), Statistical Methods in Research and Production, 4th ed., Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. H. Gautschi (1959), Some remarks on Herbach’s paper, “Optimum nature of the F-test for Model II in the balanced case,” Ann. Math. Statist., 30, 960–963.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • F. A. Graybill (1976), Theory and Application of the Linear Model, Duxbury, North Scituate, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • F. A. Graybill and C.-M. Wang (1980), Confidence intervals on nonnegative linear combinations of variances, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 75, 869–873.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L. H. Herbach (1959), Properties of Model II type analysis of variance tests A: Optimum nature of the F-test for Model II in the balanced case, Ann. Math. Statist., 30, 939–959.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Hodges, Jr. and E. L. Lehmann (1951), Some applications of the Cramér-Rao inequality, in L. Lecam and J. Neyman, Proceedings Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Jeffreys (1961), Theory of Probability, 3rd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK; 1st ed., 1939; 2nd ed., 1948.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D. E. Johnson and F. A. Graybill (1972a), Estimating σ2 in a two-way classification model with interaction, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 67, 388–394.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D. E. Johnson and F. A. Graybill (1972b), An analysis of a two-way model with interaction and no replication, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 67, 862–868.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. W. Kimball (1951), On dependent tests of significance in the analysis of variance, Ann. Math. Statist., 22, 600–602.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • K. R. Lee and C. H. Kapadia (1984), Variance component estimators for the balanced two-way mixed model, Biometrics, 40, 507–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. L. Lehmann (1986), Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York; reprint, 1997, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T.-F. C. Lu, F. A. Graybill, and R. K. Burdick (1987), Confidence intervals on the ratio of expected mean squares (θ + 2)/θ 3, Biometrics, 43, 535–543.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. H. Lyles and L. L. Kupper (1998), UMVU estimators for the population mean and variance based on random effects models for lognormal data, Comm. Statist. A Theory Methods, 27, 795–818.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • G. A. Milliken and D. E. Johnson (1992), Analysis of Messy Data, Vol. 1, Chapman and Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • K. Paark and R. K. Burdick (1998), Confidence intervals for the mean in a balanced two-factor random effets model, Comm. Statist. A Theory Methods, 27, 2807–2825.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Perkins (1972), The principle component analysis of genotype-environmental interactions and physical measures of the environmental, Heredity, 29, 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Perkins (1974), Orthogonal and principal components analysis of genotype-environmental interactions for multiple numerical traits, Heredity, 32, 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Perkins and J. L. Jinks (1968a), Enviromental and genotype-enviromental components of variability III: Multiple lines and crosses, Heredity, 23, 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Perkins and J. L. Jinks (1968b), Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability IV: Non-linear interactions for multiple inbred lines, Heredity, 23, 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Portnoy (1971), Formal Bayes estimation with application to a random effects model, Ann. Math. Statist, 42, 1379–1402.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai (1974a), Non-negative maximum likelihood and restricted maximum likelihood estimators of variance components in two simple linear models, Util.Matk, 5, 151–160.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai (1974b), Some formal Bayes estimators of variance components in the balanced three-stage nested random effects models, Comm. Statist, 3, 233–242.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai (1974c), Simultaneous confidence intervals for variance components in some balanced random effects models, Sankhyā Ser. B, 36, 278–287.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai (1975), Bayes equivariant estimators in a crossed-classification random effects model, Ann. Inst Statist Math. (Japan), 27, 501–505.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai and R. L. Anderson (1973), Confidence regions for variance ratios of random models for balanced data, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 68, 951–952.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai and A. Khurshid (1992), A comparison of estimators of variance components in a two-way balanced crossed-classification random effects model, Statistics, 23, 128–143.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • H. Sahai and A. A. Ramírez-Martínez (1975), Some formal Bayes estimators in a crossed-classification random effects model, Austral. J. Statist, 17, 43–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • G. K. Shukla (1972), An invariant test for the homogeneity of variances in a two-way classification, Biometrics, 28, 1063–1073.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • W. Y. Tan (1965), On the estimation of parameters in the analysis of variance I: Two-way simple random effects model, J. Agricultural Assoc China, 21, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Y. Tan (1981), The power function and an approximation for testing variance components in the presence of interaction in two-way random effects models, Canad. J. Statist, 9, 91–99.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • W. A. Thompson, Jr. (1962), The problem of negative estimates of variance components, Ann. Math. Statist, 33, 273–289.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • N. Ting, R. K. Burdick, and F. A. Graybill (1991), Confidence intervals on ratios of positive linear combinations of variance components, Statist. Probab. Lett, 11, 523–528.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • N. Ting and F. A. Graybill (1991), Approximate confidence interval on ratio of two variances in a two-way crossed model, Biometrical J., 33, 547–558.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Tukey (1949), One degree of freedom for non-additivity, Biometrics, 5, 232–242.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L. R. Verdooren (1980), On estimation of variance components, Statist Neer-land, 34, 83–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Weeks (1983), A Genstat Primer, Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Wolfram (1996), The Mathematica Book, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sahai, H., Ojeda, M.M. (2004). Two-Way Crossed Classification without Interaction. In: Analysis of Variance for Random Models. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8168-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8168-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6470-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-8168-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics