Skip to main content

Analysing Safety Functions and Barriers — Experiences from Different Industrial Sectors

  • Conference paper
Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

The paper gives a summary of approaches to describing and modelling safety characteristics, including safety functions and barriers. In three examples, the safety function concept has been used to describe how actual safety systems worked. The examples are an incident investigation, a safety analysis of a part of a pharmaceutical plant, and safety rules in the railway industry. Advantages and disadvantages of the concept and approach are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Harms-Ringdahl L. On the modelling and characterisation of safety functions. In Schueller & Kafka (eds): Safety and Reliability. A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1459–1462, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson W.G. MORT Safety assurance systems. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hollnagel E. Accident Analysis and Barrier Functions. Institute for Energy Technology. Kjeller, Norway, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). Functional safety: safety related systems (Standard IEC 1508). IEC, Geneva, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harms-Ringdahl L. Safety analysis — Principles and practice in occupational safety (2nd edition). London: Taylor & Francis, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Harms-Ringdahl L. Investigation of barriers and safety functions related to accidents. In Bedford & van Gelder (eds.): Safety and Reliability. A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 763–769, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harms-Ringdahl L. Assessing safety functions — results from a case study at an industrial workplace. Safety Science 2003, Vol. 41, Issue 8, pp. 701–720, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harms-Ringdahl L. and Kecklund L. Safety Functions in Railways — a Structural Analysis of Safety Rules. Submitted, ESREL 2004, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harms-Ringdahl, L. (2004). Analysing Safety Functions and Barriers — Experiences from Different Industrial Sectors. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U., Dang, V.N. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1057-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-410-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics