Skip to main content

Failing Pouch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Coloproctology

Abstract

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RP/IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis [1, 2] (Fig. 20.1). J-pouch is the most commonly used reservoir because it is easier to construct compared with S or W pouches [2] (Fig. 20.2). Stapled IPAA has become the preferred approach with good long-term functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) over a hand-sewn anastomosis [3] (Fig. 20.3). In patients with toxic megacolon or severe fulminant colitis, RP/IPAA is performed in multistages including subtotal colectomy and end ileostomy and then in about 6 months completion proctectomy and IPAA with/without diverting ileostomy. Ileostomy is closed in 3 months following IPAA after checking integrity of pouch and IPAA using water-contrasted enema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978;2:85–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fazio VW, O’Riordain MG, Lavery IC, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;230:575–84; discussion 584–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Kiran RP, Fazio VW. Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients. Surgery. 2009;146:723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hueting WE, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients. Dig Surg. 2005;22:69–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC, Manilich E, Connor J, Preen M, Delaney CP. Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg. 2003;238:605–14; discussion 614–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dehni N, Remacle G, Dozois RR, Banchini F, Tiret E, Parc R. Salvage reoperation for complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 2005;92:748–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shawki S, Belizon A, Person B, Weiss EG, Sands DR, Wexner SD. What are the outcomes of reoperative restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery? Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:884–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah NS, Remzi FH, Massmann A, Baixauli J, Fazio VW. Management and treatment outcome of pouch-vaginal fistulas following restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:911–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacLean AR, O’Connor B, Parkes R, Cohen Z, McLeod RS. Reconstructive surgery for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a viable surgical option with acceptable results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:880–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fonkalsrud EW, Bustorff-Silva J. Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches. Ann Surg. 1999;229:197–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fazio VW, Wu JS, Lavery IC. Repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to salvage septic complications of pelvic pouches: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment. Ann Surg. 1998;228:588–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baixauli J, Delaney CP, Wu JS, Remzi FH, Lavery IC, Fazio VW. Functional outcome and quality of life after repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for complications of ileoanal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathis KL, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Cima RR, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH. Outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing partial or complete reconstructive surgery for failing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2009;249:409–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith JJ, Das P, Canero A, Nicholls RJ. Long-term results of abdominal salvage surgery following restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:231–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Kirat HT, Wu JS, Lavery IC, Kiran RP. Repeat pouch surgery by the abdominal approach safely salvages failed ileal pelvic pouch. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garrett KA, Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Fazio VW, Shen B, Kiran RP. Outcome of salvage surgery for ileal pouches referred with a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1967–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirat HT, Kiran RP, Oncel M, Shen B, Fazio VW, Remzi FH. Management of leak from the tip of the “j” in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:454–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan HT, Morton D, Connolly AB, Pringle W, White M, Keighley MR. Quality of life after pouch excision. Br J Surg. 1998;85:249–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lepistö A, Luukkonen P, Järvinen HJ. Cumulative failure rate of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and quality of life after failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1289–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Das P, Smith JJ, Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Antropoli M, John Nicholls R. Quality of life after indefinite diversion/pouch excision in ileal pouch failure patients. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:718–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bengtsson J, Börjesson L, Willén R, Oresland T, Hultén L. Can a failed ileal pouch anal anastomosis be left in situ? Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:503–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feza H. Remzi M.D., FACS, FASCRS, FTSS (Hon) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirat, H.T., Remzi, F.H. (2012). Failing Pouch. In: Brown, S., Hartley, J., Hill, J., Scott, N., Williams, J. (eds) Contemporary Coloproctology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-888-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-889-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics