Skip to main content

Framing and the Poliheuristic Theory of Decision: The United Fruit Company and the 1954 U.S.-Led Coup in Guatemala

  • Chapter
Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making

Part of the book series: Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis ((AFPA))

Abstract

On June 27, 1954, President Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán of Guatemala resigned. His government was threatened with an invasion by a group of exiles led by Lieutenant Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas who were part of a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)-sponsored covert operation to overthrow Arbenz. Militarily, Castillo Armas’s small band of exiles had not been very successful; however, the intensive psychological battle being waged by the CIA was very intimidating to the people of Guatemala City, the Guatemalan military, and even to President Arbenz. Arbenz felt certain the Guatemalan military could defeat Castillo Armas, but his concern was that the United States would send its own military to invade if he did not back down (Gleijeses 1991, 317–322). Thus, the United States brought an end to the Guatemalan revolution of 1944 and the democratic government it established.The United Fruit Company also got rid of a government that seriously threatened its interests in Guatemala and throughout the region of Central America.This brief period of reform and progress in Guatemala was replaced by a succession of military-led authoritarian regimes and more than three decades of instability and guerrilla warfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelson, Robert P., and Ariel Levi. 1985. “Decision Making and Decision Theory.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., ed. Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, Stephen E. 1981. Ike’s Spies: Eisenhower and the Espionage Establishment. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Paul A. 1983. “Decision Making by Objection and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (June): 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aybar, Jose M. 1978. Dependency and Intervention: The Case of Guatemala in 1954. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, Lee Roy. 1990. Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, Lee Roy, and Terence R. Mitchell. 1978. “A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies.” Academy of Management Review 3 (April): 439–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, Edward L. 1965. Biography of an Idea: Memoirs of Public Relations Counsel Edward L. Bernays. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, Robert S., and Lisa L. Scherer. 1988. “The Effects of Response Mode and Importance on Decision-Making Strategies: Judgment Versus Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41 (February): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings, Robert S, and Stephen A. Marcus. 1983. “Measures of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Models of Decision Behavior: Process Tracing Versus Policy Capturing.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31 (June): 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasier, Cole. 1976. The Hovering Giant: U.S. Responses to Revolutionary Change in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, Martha L. 1994. Images and Intervention: U.S. Policies in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRouen, Karl R. 1994. “The Decision Not to Use Force: A Noncompensatory Perspective.” Discussion paper 21. Program in Foreign Policy Decision Making, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, Roland. 1996. “Guatemala: Politics in a Central American City-State.” In Latin American Politics and Development, ed. Howard J. Wiarda and Harvey F. Kline, 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower, Dwight. 1963. The White House Years: Mandate for Change. vol. 1. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E.Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. Kevin, Neal Schmitt, Susan L. Schechtman, Brian M. Hults, and Mary L. Doherty. 1989. “Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43 (February): 75–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, Deborah. 1993. “Reasons for Framing Effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54 (April): 399–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geva, Nehemia, Allison Astorino-Courtois, and Alex Mintz. 1996. “Marketing the Peace Process in the Middle East: The Effectiveness of Thematic and Evaluative Framing in Jordan and Israel.” In Arms Spending, Development and Security, ed. Manas Chatterji, Jacques Fontanel, and Akira Hattori. New Delhi: APH Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, Nehemia, Steven B. Redd, and Alex Mintz. 1996. “Structure and Process in Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Experimental Assessment of Poliheuristic Propositions.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA, April 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, Federico G. 1971. Latin American-United States Relations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleijeses, Piero. 1991. Shattered Hope: The Guatemalan Revolution and the United States, 1944–1954. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, Robin M. 1987. Judgement and Choice: The Psychology of Decision, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hybel, Alex Roberto. 1990. How Leaders Reason: US Intervention in the Caribbean Basin and Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerman, Richard H. 1982. The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of Intervention. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFeber, Walter. 1993. Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America, 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, Kenneth. 1997. “Revolutions and Attributions: Making Sense of Eisenhower Administration Policies in Bolivia and Guatemala.” Diplomatic History 21 (Spring): 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. 1992a. “An Introduction to Prospect Theory.” Political Psychology 13 (2): 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. 1992b. “Prospect Theory and International Relations: Theoretical Applications and Analytical Problems.” Political Psychology 13 (2): 283–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, Zeev. 1990. “Framing the National Interest: The Manipulation of Foreign Policy Decisions in Group Settings.” World Politics 43 (October): 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Thomas. 1967. An American Company: The Tragedy of United Fruit. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, Thomas, and Marjorie Melville. 1971. Guatemala: The Politics of Land Ownership. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1993. “The Decision to Attack Iraq: A Noncompensatory Theory of Decision Making.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (December): 595–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1995. “The ‘Noncompensatory Principle’ of Coalition Formation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 7 (July): 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1997. “Foreign Policy Decisionmaking: Bridging the Gap Between the Cognitive Psychology and Rational Actor Schools.” In Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva. 1997. “The Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva. 1998. “The Poliheuristic Theory of Decision.” Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex, Nehemia Geva, Steven B. Redd, and Amy Carnes. 1997. “The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making: An Analysis Using the Decision Board Platform.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molineu, Harold. 1986. U.S. Policy Toward Latin America: From Regionalism to Globalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John W., James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1988. “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (July): 534–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John W., James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, Stephen G. 1988. Eisenhower and Latin America: The Foreign Policy of Anticommunism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, Stephen G. 1990. “Dulles, Latin America, and Cold War Anticommunism.” In John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War, ed. Richard H. Immerman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Stephen, and Stephen Kinzer. 1982. Bitter Fruit: The Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Ronald M. 1958. Communism in Guatemala, 1944–1954. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, Philip E. 1992. “The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward a Social Contingency Model.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Mark P. Zanna. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, Philip E, and Richard Boettger. 1989. “Accountability: A Social Magnifier of the Dilution Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (September): 388–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (January): 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alex Mintz

Copyright information

© 2003 Alex Mintz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor-Robinson, M.M., Redd, S.B. (2003). Framing and the Poliheuristic Theory of Decision: The United Fruit Company and the 1954 U.S.-Led Coup in Guatemala. In: Mintz, A. (eds) Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making. Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07848-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics