Abstract
The pattern of death and destruction which, with the significant exceptions that have been noted, encompasses the act of adultery must raise the question of the validity of its own compulsion. One way of trying to answer such a question is to ask, more simply, whether the reader of the novels, having seen the issue raised and resolved by the various authors, feels the given outcome to be justified or not; and in either eventuality to try to ascertain at what level the justification operates, or fails to — whether the grounds for the punishment of the nineteenth-century adulterer/adulteress arise out of relativities like convention or economics, or out of more profound psychological, religious, or even mystical imperatives.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. Poggioli, The Phoenix and the Spider ( Cambridge, Mass., 1957 ) p. 70.
P. J. Yarrow, La Pensée politique et religieuse de Barbey d’Aurevilly (Geneva, and Paris, 1961) p. 169.
G. Steiner, Tolstoy or Dostoevsky (Peregrine ed., 1967) p. 256.
D. Morris, The Naked Ape (Corgi ed., 1968) p. 35.
Copyright information
© 1976 Judith Armstrong
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armstrong, J. (1976). The Justification of the Order. In: The Novel of Adultery. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02968-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02968-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-02970-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02968-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)